Nope, sorry. Einstein would never say something so trite. It doesn’t mean anything.You are right :) but I love this " trite" citation....
Sometimes banality reflect the situation itself....This was my point....
It is for the last decades in all audio thread this break-in "problem" that is not one simple problem but reflective of a complex situation, a trite problematic, implicating an experiencing subjectivity and a complex audio system .....
I dont think blind test, or comparison will settle that, except for those who call the improvement in some break-in process an illusion because it is mostly only subjectively experienced ( not necessarily an illusion or a placebo tough) and not measurable the way they will like it...
Like say Einstein in a non trite citation:
"“We can not solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them.”
And this apply also to the break- in problem ….
But you said that this citation is not meaningful.... I dont think so... This is my translation:
“Not everything that counts can be counted,
and not everything that can be counted counts.”
All parameters linked to a problem cannot always be takes into account by the problem's statement
And more than that some parameters of the problem are sometimes secondary for the solution...