Differences between Magnepan 1.6qr and 1.7i

Last time I checked the true ribbon tweeter started with the 3 series, the 3.7i being the current version. Also in the 20 series and recently the ’all out’ 30.7. The smaller Maggies always had quasi ribbon tweeters.

Some say this actually results in a more integrated sound. The ribbon tweeter is much lighter and faster than the other drivers, so it has a tendency to ’stick out’ a little in some systems. But I have to say that the latest generation 20.7 I now own is more of ’one cloth’ than the 20 which I previously had for many years. It’s not entirely clear how Magnepan accomplished this, but I think the much simpler crossover may have something to do with that.

I don’t exactly know what changes Magnepan made going from the 1.6 to the 1.7i, but according to the reviewers the new version is far better. Than again, that’s what they always say. Better to listen to what ’real world users’ have to say about this. Lucky for you there are plenty of those around here...

Thanks, Robergerman2 and Edgewear.  I'm hoping some of those folks who've had both will weigh in.

I replaced my 1.6s with 1.7s.  I remember the 1.7 being a nice improvement.  It was a much more coherent speaker.  The tweeter on the 1.6 could sound a little too prominent.  That issue was addressed nicely with the 1.7s.  I have to tell you that I had them in a 12 X 22 room and there were times I wished for more space.  I don't see the dimensions of your room listed but if you feel it is going to be tight, I would try to get a home audition before committing.  Both the LRS and the .7 get great reviews; either one might be a better fit.

Thanks BDP24, but I intend to stick with Maggies.