Hi all Per the advice everyone has provided I am looking into some separates that have reliable specs for power into 2 ohms (seems like there are a number of good options here) - will definitely report back as this is an interesting subject.
Thanks!
|
Hi All, I know it's been a while, but I thought I would report back as so many of you gave me helpful advice. I had a chance to try the SS AR1s with a very capable Accuphase integrated and the results were clear and surprising.
Relative to the tube-based Luxman LX380, the solid state (and much more powerful class A/AB) Accuphase was muddy and muffled (and I say this as someone who was highly biased towards the Accuphase and was anticipating great things). As soon as I swapped them I could tell something had happened to the mid and high end of the spectrum - things were not nearly as clear or articulate - it was like there was a veil of something in between the music and me (really obvious on things like voices and acoustic guitar for example). I really can't think of any better word than 'muffled.' I thought perhaps I was mis-hearing things so I had my wife do a few casual tests with her back to the equipment, and unprompted she made the same comments about "amp B" (the Accuphase). With the Accuphase I certainly noticed a bit more definition in the lower registers and bass lines had a bit more clarity to them, but a) the difference wasn't like night and day relative to the Luxman (they were very close), and b) it seemed to involve a massive trade off for what I can only describe as 'transparency' in the high end. with the Accuphase in place vocals and acoustic instruments sound like a thin door has been closed between the music and my listening position (honestly)
I am really surprised/stumped as to the results, as I had high expectations for the Accuphase and the SS AR1s. This Accuphase amp is highly regarded and in all the literature I read I would never have expected this outcome, but that's what my ears told me in the end. Obviously this is all down to individual taste and opinion, but the clarity of the Luxman was not bested by this entrant.
re next steps, I guess im looking at either something like very capable SS mono blocks (like the Marantz ma9s2) to see if that can overcome the acuphase's shortcomings, or a more powerful tube amp (which again, on paper, shouldn't play this well with the SS AR1s, but there you have it) - still not sure how the LX380's specs on paper should be working this well with these Sony's, but they sound far superior to the first SS contender~
Till next time! |
@sfmorris, There could be something wrong with the Accuphase. It should not sound muddy and muffled. You may want to check on that possibility before moving on.
|
I am really surprised/stumped as to the results, as I had high
expectations for the Accuphase and the SS AR1s. This Accuphase amp is
highly regarded and in all the literature I read I would never have
expected this outcome, but that's what my ears told me in the end.
Obviously this is all down to individual taste and opinion, but the
clarity of the Luxman was not bested by this entrant. In a nutshell, high damping factors are overrated! Duke LeJeurne of Audiokinesis gave an excellent reason why (as a speaker designer): " A high damping factor will provide very good control of the bass drivers."
Hmmmm.
For
a quick summation of my thoughts, skip to the last two paragraphs.
Apologies for getting fairly nerdy in between here and there.
In
practice, any series resistance in between the amplifier and the
woofer’s voice coil effectively ADDS TO the amplifier’s output
impedance, and correspondingly reduces the damping factor.
Let’s
run some numbers. Supposes our speaker has a nice 2.5 kHz second-order
crossover, which calls for a 1 mH inductor in series with the woofer.
Power handling requirements are easily met by an 18 gauge air-core
inductor, which can handle 300 watts before saturation. The series
resistance of this inductor is .51 ohms.
And let’s suppose we
have an uber-amplifier with a damping factor of one zillion. Or one
zillion zillion. Or one zillion to the zillionth power. It won’t matter.
After the signal passes through that inductor, our
uber-amplfier’s amplifier’s effective damping factor is now about 17.
And this is assuming only the one series inductor, and ignoring any
other wiring.
So in most cases it really doesn’t matter how high
the amplifier’s damping factor is. The series resistance in the
crossover (and/or speaker wires) dominates.
Okay, but what about this "very good control of the bass drivers" that we’re apparently missing out on?
Well,
turns out that it’s not nearly as dramatic as the wording implies. It
all shows up as a change to the electrical damping of the woofer’s motor
- the electrical system Q, or Qes.
Assuming a typical
high-quality 8-ohm woofer in the example above, the series inductor
effectively raises the woofer’s electrical Q by about 7%. So if the
woofer’s electrical Q was .28, the series inductor effectively raises it
to about .30. This could EASILY be an improvement! We'll get more bass
with a higher Qes, but the designer should take it into account by
sizing and tuning the box based on our modified Qes of .30. And if he
hasn’t, this difference can still be largely compensated for with a few
handfuls of stuffing material.
I think amplifier marketing departments may have oversold the benefits of having a high damping factor.
Or to put it another way, in my opinion, super-high damping factors
are, in most cases, of academic interest only. I certainly would not
trade off anything that really matters in order to get a high damping
factor.
Duke
This post is from https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/how-to-accurately-gauge-speaker-sensitivity-to-match-with-tub...Our most popular amps have a fairly low damping factor- if DF were that important, we'd have been out of business decades ago. |
Hi, Consider hearing them with a Pass amp. Sony at Shinagawa HQ test them with Pass power amps, Sony,s long discontinued N1, NR10, and lately demonstrate them with their own VFET, in an amp designed by Pass. Just food for thought. It’s a speaker that needs some push. You have an amazing speaker.
|