Oracle CDP 2000 vs 1000

>>If you love the appearance then you have to pay more for CDT2000 with the same sound as CDT1000.<<

That's not quite true. The CD-2000 has a much more sophisticated and innovative suspension system than the CD-1000. In a highly resolving system, the superiority of the CD-2000 is quite apparent. Both however, share the same transport and electronics.

Disclaimer: I sell Oracle.
Bill Feil
AudioFeil International

ths bill.

You'd said "In a highly resolving system, the superiority of the CD-2000 is quite apparent"

that's THE question. How could you describe me THIS superiority. Does it make large improvement in sound stage an imaging for example ?

ths
Laurent

Since you apparently like the '1000, you might as wellpurchase one.

"In a highly resolving system, the superiority of the CD-2000 is quite apparent."

Well, I didn't say they are the same, just pretty much similar. I heard them both with Martin Logan Pro and Audio Research MkIII, using Audio note 3x DAC, and then MF Trivista 21... and the sound was not much diffrence. And the Saleman of the store also agreed with that So I don't know what other HIGHER SYSTEM that Bill listened to ??? And don't know the above system I've listened to is high enough for the CDT2000 !!!???
Honestly, I prefer the CDT2000 over the CDT1000 because of the look, but with the price of CDT2000 over CDT1000 (and has only "more sophisticated and innovative suspension system than the CD-1000", unless I won the lotto....otherwise wouldn't waste bucks on it. Because "Both however, share the same transport and electronics."
That's why I told Laurent : it's your call ! If you can afford then go ahead....

Are you saying that the AN 3x isn't much better than the Trivista 21?