Media Choice?


I can use some opinions. 


I currently own no CDs of any type. All my music is in Flac 16bit and 24bit. 

I was told that with my equipment that a CD (16bit) ripped would sound better than the same album from a streaming source. (My equipment is Antipodes CX-EX solution with a P1 (ripper) and P2 going in to a Lampizator Atlantic TRP DAC)

Moving forward, if I had a choice, what would you think will provide the highest sound quality

1) HDCD ripped vs 24/192 Flac from server vs HI-res stream via tidal. 

2) regular CD ripped vs Hi-Res Stream via Tidal. 

TYIA
jordanmj
So, I am going to stream regardless. However (in the event there are other options such as downloading files), I am assuming that playing a Flac file from the server transport will sound better than the same resolution streamed via a streaming transport. Is that correct? 

Is it also correct that a 24/192 Flac will sound better than a 20/44.1 HDCD ripped to Flac, then played via the server? 

Thanks all! 
TBC: True HDCD encoded disks needs to be properly decoded somewhere, either in software (either storage or playback) or in the DAC. There are also a number of false HDCD marked recordings which while using the digital signature, did not actually take advantage of any of the advanced features of HDCD. Still, storage and compute is
cheap. Personally I scanned all my FLAC and decoded those that were marked to 24/44.

The next part of this is how DAC’s sound now. They sound much much better with Redbook than they did 15 years ago. It’s much harder to hear a difference between 16/44 and 24/96 with the best DACs, but oversampling and upsampling to 88 kHz and above still show promise. Of course, some DACs sound very different at 16/44 but my point is that it’s no longer justified. I mean it’s almost as if they want to prove they are high end by maintaining a delta between 16/44 and 24/96.  Much of this probably has to do with hyper-accurate clocks becoming cheap.


Another positive outcome that has happened is asynchronous USB. Letting the DAC control the rate of data coming to it instead of say, a CD spinner with all the mechanical issues that can cause jitter, has really levelled the playing field.  On the one hand, the input is more jitter resistant, on the other, USB is now asynchronous, so for the audiophile things have continued to improve regardless of your source.


The main lesson I want to say about all of this is that you may be splitting hairs that don’t matter as much as the convenience of access and playback. If you aren’t blown away by Tidal, or CD playback or a High rez version being clearly superior, maybe it’s’ best to just sit back and enjoy what you have without attempting to find the best?

- E
There's no one format that you can depend on for best sound.  Sound quality varies from album to album so much that how well the album was recorded is the most important factor in sound quality.  From there, how well it was converted to various formats varies also.  You have to listen to various albums in various formats on a case by case basis if you want to find the best.

You can find discussions of sound quality and formats here:

https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/forums/music-corner.2/

but it 's not easy to find the best sounding version of each album.

I also expect the sound quality of streaming to continue to improve because it's the dominant format now and will probably become more dominant as time goes on, but again, you don't own the music.