Stylus shape?
Here’s a rough-and-ready comparison, from a guy who’s mounted at least a half-dozen cartridges with a now ancient Dennesen Soundtracker -- Conical styli are inexpensive and easy to set up for pretty good, easy on the ears sound but they come up short on detail, imaging and air. Elliptical will give you more detail, imaging & air than spherical/conical, and they’re still reasonably easy to mount and align onto the arm. Chakster’s list of advanced shapes can all get you close to nirvana but set up and alignment become critical. Stylus rake angle has to be right on, which means you have the tone arm properly leveled (which can be a ticklish process). This includes having to account for how much the tracking force might deflect the tracking angle. It the adjustment is off, say hello to distortion, particularly as you reach the dreaded inner grooves.... |
Proper alignment of advanced stylus profile is not so difficult, manufacturers always give us recommended tracking force, the rest is just the same as with any profile (azimuth, overhang, tonearm vta). Tonearm without adjustable VTA is junk if it wasn’t designed for one dedicated cartridge. Azimuth adjustment can be made with a proper headshell with adjustable azimuth and overhang. Protractor like Dr. Feickert NG is a must have for proper alignments (Baerwald, Lofrgen, Stevenson). Everything can be adjusted if your vision is fine without any special devices. Don’t be afraid to use advanced profiles. |
musicfan - a couple of days ago I found this on Soundsmith's website: https://www.sound-smith.com/articles/stylus-shape-information Hope you find this information helpful. |
