2. speakers
  3. 159062-115924

Spikes or rubber feet.

I've got a nice pair of tower speakers that are new to me. They weigh 65 pounds each. They sit on hardwood floors. Currently they have hard rubber feet that screw into the bases. They also came with spikes. Spikes are a no-go for the hardwood floors but the spikes also come with metal disks that sit on the floor and that spikes sit on. There is a cone shaped dimple in the disk that the spike fits into.

Is there likely to be any appreciable benefit to the spikes sitting on disks compared to the hard rubber feet? They are obviously easier to move around with the rubber feet.


n80
n80 OP
2,122 posts
 
Thanks guys. I'm not looking for a solution to a problem. Just wondering what the best of the two options would be.

The hard rubber feet came as original equipment on these speakers and they are fairly high end.


milpai's avatar
milpai
2,410 posts
 
Go with the spikes and metal disks (floor protectors).
tablejockey
3,923 posts
 
If you the spikes, put felt pads w/adhesive backing on the discs. You can then slide them on the hardwood for easy positioning.
limomangus's avatar
limomangus
1,428 posts
 
I have a rug floor on my floor the polk lsim707 came with rubber and metal spikes.i use the rubber. NO problem. 
cd318
2,636 posts
 
@n80,

Rubber decouples, spikes couple.

Accelerometer readings indicate that there is far less vibration/resonance through the baffle if the speaker is decoupled.

It’s also possible that a loudspeaker may sound 'better balanced' despite greater baffle resonances but for greater resolution I’d prefer to use rubber feet to decouple.

I don’t think it’s anything to get too concerned about when it comes to well designed loudspeakers. Any decent designer would no doubt have worked very hard to reduce cabinet resonances to a minimum beforehand.
More to discover