Poor value vs snake oil...


John Darko has done a good podcast with Jeff Dorgay of TONEaudio on snake oil. This prompts my post, as I think he is onto something.

See:
https://darko.audio/2020/03/podcast-20-snake-oil/

To try and summarise where his head is, he seems to be saying that 
  • Snake oil, (the selling of something worthless as a remedy) is not about price. A $1 rip off is still a rip off. 
  • For something to be snake oil, it must be a confidence trick, e.g. the selling of sugar water as medicine. This is not about value judgements, its about fraud.
  • That selling something that makes a tiny improvement for a lot of money is not snake oil, as there is an improvement, there is an actual product doing something, it is just that it is not worth it. 

I was interested in this topic as a lot of us seem to throw about the "snake oil" insult freely. Those $10k speaker cables are snake oil to someone who only has a $2k system. I think it is worth unpicking this a bit, so we can better insult each other.

So thanks to Mr Darko's musings, here is where my head is:

Snake Oil: this only makes sense from the perspective of the seller. If they know that they are selling lies, selling sugar water as medicine, selling an empty box that does nothing, then they are perpetrating a fraud, and can be called snake oil salespeople. 

So my definition of snake oil is where the seller has no legitimate reason to claim their product brings any benefit. If they can't show that some people get benefit, or can point to measurable change, then they are knowingly selling a lie. 

Now I totally accept that there are many many products out there that are not worth their sticker price, but this is an entirely different concept to snake oil. Snake oil is about the mind of the seller, where as "worth" is in the mind of the buyer. We, the buyers are the judge of value (worth), we all have different opinions, and who is to say who is right. 

So if my neighbour spends the cost of a good car on some speaker cables, I can moan about her wasting money, but it would be incorrect to say she has bought snake oil. Her cables are demonstrably physically different from my bell wire, so she has got something for her cash. I just don't think she got enough value for her money, which is a judgement call, and hey, she just might be a heck of a lot richer than me. 

I will end with an example:

Say I sell hair conditioner which I make at home by filling nice looking bottles with water from my faucet. I sell each bottle for $100 and make up lots of quotes from satisfied customers saying how it changed their lives. Well, if I did that I would say I am a snake oil salesman.

But say that instead of filling with water, I fill my bottles with conditioner I bought down at the drug store for $2 a bottle. I sell my bottles in nice store, or at an artisanal market, and a few people tweet that it works really well, and I use their quotes in my ads...  then I think I am not a snake oil salesman, but a businessman. It would not be my problem that my customers are getting poor value. Hey, that is their problem. Maybe they really like my bottle. 
 
128x128rols
"snake oil....most power conditioners."

And any bald hair conditioners. Use oil treatment instead.
What’s the relationship between SO and placebos?
Before my systematic listening experiments to increase my 3 embeddings controls quality, to improve the way my audio system was integrated in my house, many upgrade of parts, or buying of few tweaks, introduce changes that were small but there in some way, placebos or not...

SO(snake oil) and placebos qualifications are linked to a SINGULAR product and his SINGULAR effect.... The audible effect being small....We can ask ourself, was this change real enough? An is this change worth it and the amount of money invested ?

After my upgrading spree during some years to buy the best audio component i could buy, i was unsatisfied...Despite all these changes and upgrades, the question: are these changes real enough(placebo) and worth my money stay with me ?

But for the last 2 years taking the work in my own hand, i begins a set of methodical listenings experiments, and something change, a step at a times, EACH WEEK, incrementally better, coming first from the mechanical embedding , and after that from continuous improvement in my electrical and acoustical embeddings...

All my controls device are cheap and homemade, i developed my 3 embeddings methods , and EACH WEEK, for the last 2 years i has seen a tremensous increase in S.Q. with the same components, listening to the same known files...

My homemade controls are not snake oil nor placebo....Placebo enter in ANY experience anyway, it is a natural bias in ALL human experience....And i sell nothing, my idea are free and are there to convince people that good Hi-Fi experience may cost low money, contrary to a widely assumed opinions by most...


But explaining a set of continuous changes in the same direction by placebo explanation is like saying to a culturist exercising each day that his muscular mass increase is the result of placebo effect only.... For sure if you want muscular mass increase the mind set is important, and working with something about which someone says to you that it will be helping is a good "bias" and a welcoming positive placebo.... But you know that the muscular mass grows with real working not  mostly by hope and bias that  may help and will help tough....

I know that my device controls gives me the audio system i was dreaming of for all these years ....Not my positive mindset only , but my working with the electrical grid and the complex acoustics of my room with passive materials and active devices...

If not, placebo is not the right word to use about me, hallucinations is better...

I am then an " hallucinated audiophile", i prefer that branding to this trivial placebo accusation.... Placebo is eveywhere anyway, it is constitunional of human experience; very good S. Q. is not experimented in all audio system tough, even after many placebo upgrade or buying....This is my experience only....

My best to you.... :)






:)

I must say that i like mushrooms a lot....But my hallucinations comes from my speakers....Help me doctor....

:)
rols...I was Ok with what you were saying and your personal definition of "snake oil" until your last example where you sell someone else's product as your own and then use testimonials from people who are happy with what actually isn't your product but instead is someone else's. I agree that would not constitute snake oil, but it would be highly unethical and possibly fraudulent. Bad example.