Quick power cord question:


With a  DIY power cord that I just made, (pure, solid .9999 12 gauge silver) the tubes in that mono amp seem to be a little brighter than the other amp with the original power cord. So, do you think the tubes are brighter because they are getting more power through the new DIY cord or is the amp having to work harder and that’s why the tubes are brighter?

 ozzy


128x128ozzy
What difference does what it, "looks like" make, if he’s WRONG?    The patent application spells out the goal of the DBS system.   ie (verbatim): "FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to methods and apparatus of connecting and communicating signals between electrical devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to biasing a dielectric with an electrical or electrostatic potential to reduce undesirable electrical properties of the material such that signal quality between the electrical devices is enhanced. The invention has special utility within the field of audio and video equipment and signal transmission"     The balance of the application contains nothing about RFI, but- everything about how the DBS system is supposed to enhance the transmission of various signals, by the biasing of a cable’s dielectric.        Too bad so many are too lazy to bother reading, educating, or- informing themselves, rather than trying to be contrary.    This conversation has become tedious.    I’ll leave the ubiquitous last words to others.     Best regards and happy listening, everyone!

More particularly, the present invention relates to biasing a dielectric with an electrical or electrostatic potential to reduce undesirable electrical properties of the material such that signal quality between the electrical devices is enhanced.
It doesn't say or mention what is biasing the dielectric.

As for reducing undesirable electrical properties of the material, that can be another way of saying that it's making it (the dielectric) resistant to RFI without the need to spell it out, rendering the patent moot so others can't copy it.

And, in that link you provided, AQ states that they finally found a way to use DC as a shield to reject RFI and EMI, so where did I misunderstand things, and just where did the reviewer get it wrong as well?

How you can read into it that I am being contrary is just plain silly.

All the best,
Nonoise

"Flat Earth science" If you haven't considered it recently don't give us your uninformed opinion on it. Some people are finding it works for them. I have found that if I am listening to music, get up to change a cd and leave my beer by the player, then sit back down my beer stays where I left it. If the earth was round and spinning in a circle, my beer would come to me. 
I just noticed that rodman99999 deleted the link he provided, so here it is in case anyone's wondering what was said and meant:
https://www.synergisticresearch.com/active-shielding/

All the best,
Nonoise
"Holy hanna... Brighter? You better hope not, that is a sign of bad not good...REALLY it is...

ALL, EVERY BIT of the kidding aside, brighter is NOT GOOD!!"



As (oldhvymec) said, brighter is not better.
That's not what he said. Goodness, the lengths some will go to.
?????????????????