I read this review about reviewers

yes 1+1=2

And 1 x 1 = 1

But do you know that beside this additive equation there is also other world, for example non-additive geometry ?

In a nutshell the = sign veil or hide a dynamical process... Dont take the = sign for the absolute last word about anything... Even about the numbers mystery.... Especially about the numbers mystery....


Beside descriptive concepts of some biological science there exist other sciences who have something to say about man and consciousness with their own descriptive concepts...

If you want to begins to explain something the answer is often between the many borders of many sciences descriptive concepts....Like in audio for example, acoustical biology, acoustical engineering, electrical and electronical engineering, mechanical engineering, music, etc

:)

« You are an idiot mahgister, embedding your knowledge is not enough, upgrade it first» - Groucho Marx

Some of the posts here beggar belief.

Evidently, Darwin didn't have all the science available to him that we have today, but his broad insights were extraordinary. Much later Richard Dawkins swooped in with the concept of the Selfish Gene, to dot the i's and cross the t's.

Beside Goethe , Dawkins is a giant no doubt.... :)

The man able to prove God does no exist, is it him? I dont dare to read his book, i hate reading bad books.... i explained without being understood all my life that after reading many thousand books i hate reading....I love great books tough.... It is not the samething at all....


You seems serious about Dawkins science i dont know what to say anymore.... You kill me....

You " z" ( the verb z) my x and y thread post magical helix....

:)

I am constantly amused that some believe whatever they are told, without self investigation. It is a free world, (we're told) and given free will. (absolute)

My comments are not in favor nor denial of current science. Only the danger in absolute disregard for alternatives and blind faith in current thought. A closed mind is a terrible waste. Our original topic, the reviewer, is a great example. He could only see his science and disregarded larger market acceptance of his approach.

When I was 30 I knew everything: now, decades of experiences later, I realize I know very little. It actually is liberating and wonderful to know so little.