I read this review about reviewers

Some of the posts here beggar belief.

Evidently, Darwin didn't have all the science available to him that we have today, but his broad insights were extraordinary. Much later Richard Dawkins swooped in with the concept of the Selfish Gene, to dot the i's and cross the t's.

Beside Goethe , Dawkins is a giant no doubt.... :)

The man able to prove God does no exist, is it him? I dont dare to read his book, i hate reading bad books.... i explained without being understood all my life that after reading many thousand books i hate reading....I love great books tough.... It is not the samething at all....


You seems serious about Dawkins science i dont know what to say anymore.... You kill me....

You " z" ( the verb z) my x and y thread post magical helix....

:)

I am constantly amused that some believe whatever they are told, without self investigation. It is a free world, (we're told) and given free will. (absolute)

My comments are not in favor nor denial of current science. Only the danger in absolute disregard for alternatives and blind faith in current thought. A closed mind is a terrible waste. Our original topic, the reviewer, is a great example. He could only see his science and disregarded larger market acceptance of his approach.

When I was 30 I knew everything: now, decades of experiences later, I realize I know very little. It actually is liberating and wonderful to know so little. 

Thinking is a working job with sometimes not much money at the end....

I know i was selling and advised people about books in all fields of life...People dont want to think AT ALL, except mostly the young one... Then i discussed all my life with young researchers...( average people dont need advice in their reading if they read at all because they are not on a search for knowledge at all cost, what is the last best thriller is their only boring question and i dont read thrillers ).

I know nothing at near 70, but i know what a book is and the value of some concepts and idea.... :)
( in fact i know some valuable thing, i think i lied to stay modest)

I know nothing in audio but i created my own audio experience for peanuts....And most of those that have much audio knowledge and experience dont seems to think that it is possible without money.... Then i try to understand simple facts like how to " embed" an audio system to begins with etc and i succeed....

It appeared to me necessary to use a new word for something important and simple and essential to understand in audio....The word "tweaks" was not able to describe what i was experiencing at all....

But i underestimated the power of stupidity in his capacity to not understand at all cost.... :)