I read this review about reviewers

Would not surprise me to see this thread disappear. I get carried away, can't understand not accepting evolution. It's one of the most supported theories in all of science. 

No need or reason to apologize. I fell robust discussion to be a thing of value. I was just making a snarky remark on something I’m passionate about since it affects every facet of our lives.

As for monkeys, if I had one, I’d have a hard time choosing between Scopes or Darrow for his name. 👍😄👍

All the best,
Nonoise

Maybe Jerry Falwell Jr? No ,it would  just insult the monkey. 

@mahgister  There's a huge gulf between The Selfish Gene and the allied academic material that surrounds it, and his much later books like The God Delusion.  In a way it's a pity he published those texts in the 2000s, as it diverts people's attention away from the earlier ground-breaking research in genetic biology.

twoleftears

I dont doubt that he published valid genetical biology papers, this fact is very recognized.... But his philosophy is not interesting....His concept of meme is also very poor.... A complete semiotic theory of the symbolic function in culture is way over his head and cannot be reduced to genetic biology....Publishing some valid research in genetic dont make you a great thinker... And Believing or not in God dont make the concept of God trivial by no means....Man is deluded not by the concept of God or even by his relation to God but by the cultural appropriation of God....Trashing the baby with the bath is no great philosophy and not science at all....

I apologize to you for being perhaps rude because i am too serious...

My best to you...