Danny Richie "fixes" the Linkwitz Arion loudspeaker


For some time now I have been directing those interested in loudspeaker design to Danny Richie’s GR Research Tech Talk Tuesday videos on YouTube. Here is his latest: an examination of the Linkwitz Arion loudspeaker. You may be asking yourself: if Siegfried Linkwitz is the genius he is touted to be, how is it Danny found the Orion to be lacking, and was able to find solutions for it’s failings? I’ll leave that to you to answer. In the meantime, after watching and listening to this video, you may want to watch all the Tech Talk Tuesday videos. They may just make you a more informed loudspeaker consumer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCA-eSPUkJA.









128x128bdp24
I wish I had an Orion to measure, but DR accuses Linkwitz of a number of bone-head mistakes, which I doubt, not because I’m a huge fan boy but because the late Dr. Linkwitz was one of the most meticulous speaker designers I’ve ever ever seen. Without measurements I can’t prove it, but there are not a lot of speaker designers I know who took as much care in every aspect of their design as Dr. Linkwitz.

One thing I find kind of curious is his discussion of compensating for the rising impedance of a tweeter: In real life it’s almost never done nor is it needed.

You compensate for the rising impedance of a woofer because not doing so can throw off your low pass filter design. It’s written about here:

https://speakermakersjourney.blogspot.com/2016/12/crossover-basics-zobel_8.html

However, since tweeters have no low pass filter, just a high pass, it’s a moot point, unless you have a truly high output impedance amp (i.e. tube) which can make it seem brighter, but just a tad.

Siegfried Linkwitz certainly appeared to me to be a genius. However, he designed the Orion with a required digital active crossover, and needing 8 channels of amplification. Not a loudspeaker I would want to own.

SL had his design priorities, as did/do Paul Klipsch, Peter Walker, Arnie Nudell, Richard Vandersteen, Jim Winey, Bruce Thigpen, Roger Sanders, Dave Wilson, Eric Alexander, and (shudder) Amar Bose.

Danny Richie has his, and his customers and clients (including companies making loudspeakers designed by him) seem to be amongst the most satisfied I know of (yes, myself included). To each his own!

I have learned that even the best hi-fi designers may have a blind spot. I think very highly of Roger Modjeski (Music Reference, RAM Tubes), yet discovered his in a blog he posted on his MR AudioCircle Forum. He questioned the rationale for bass traps, saying we pay more for loudspeakers that reproduce the lowest frequencies, then install bass traps to absorb the low frequencies those loudspeakers are reproducing? That statement/question revealed to me that as good an electronic engineer/amplifier designer as he was, he was not aware of room modes.

@bdp24 he most certainly was aware of room nodes, he just believed there was a better way of dealing with them than using bass traps.
I'm of the same opinion. If you don't make it everywhere, you don't have to control it everywhere.  Rule number 1. controlling the bass, is 90% of the answer, when it comes to distortion... in ALL 7 of the frequencies ranges I address. sub, bass, MB, Low mids, mids, highs and UHF.

They are addressed normally by room treatment, with the exception of 100hz and below.. Traps kill what you really don't need to be making, to begin with...

Regards

Good to hear @clio09. May I ask what that way is? One way to make bass more uniform throughout the room is by way of the DBA: Distributed Bass Array. But regardless, in rooms having dimensions shorter than the longest wavelength being produced, there are going to be standing waves, areas of high and low pressure. It is the room "ringing."

True, bass traps are very inefficient, but I got lucky and found a bunch of ASC Tube Traps for ten bucks apiece, including a pair of 16"!