2. amps-preamps
  3. 159920-976

What is missing here?

In this months Absolute Sound magazine there is a nice review of an amp that many of us would probably consider based not only on the review but on the topology utilized with the amp. The amp in question is the new Air Tight ATM 300R. This amp utilizes the 300B tube and according to Dick Olsher " The Air tight ATM300-R wowed me with countless hours of listening pleasure. It consistently brought to life the full sonic promise of the 300B". Sounds amazing right??


Except, nowhere ( except in the specs section) does it mention that this amp is limited to 9Watts/Ch!! And at that it is putting out about 10% distortion! So not only is the amp severely limited to which speakers one can match it to, but those speakers had better be ULTRA high efficiency. While most experienced a’philes will expect the extremely severe limitations of this kind of max output, how many casual listeners who read this article will realize the extreme limitations that this amp comes with? Certainly none of that is mentioned in the review, which brings up the question...why not??? How many even somewhat seasoned a’philes have made the mistake of matching a flea powered amp with a less than favorable speaker load? Let’s hear about it....
128x128daveyf
daveyf's avatar
daveyf OP
2,935 posts
 
@atmasphere  Thanks Ralph. Your post explains a lot and is certainly very instructive. Apparently the amp has 10% distortion at 9watts. I would have to believe that this is audible. Therefore, a match to the most efficient speakers one could find would seem to be mandatory. Probably only a match to a horn design would be indicated...leading to the other issues you mention.
None of this is discussed in the review, I have to question why?
atmasphere's avatar
atmasphere
11,958 posts
 
None of this is discussed in the review, I have to question why?
No idea- best to ask the reviewer. IMO/IME its a pretty important (might have wound up edited out) omission!
mijostyn's avatar
mijostyn
8,570 posts
 
Daveyf, I think you are absolutely right. In medical speak it is a drug looking for an indication. As a lover of all genres of music an amp like that is worthless. If you had horns and only listened to string quartets ....... maybe. Nine Inch Nails on ESLs with 4 subwoofers? Forget it buddy. You might as well fry your toenails. There is never such a thing as too much headroom. In my experience very powerful amps (200 watts and up) have an effortless character that few smaller amps can match and this is speaker independent. I look at these little tube amps in curiosity only. 

daveyf's avatar
daveyf OP
2,935 posts
 
@mijostyn  Agreed and disagreed. While I agree with you that basically the amp in question is essentially useless for the vast majority of users, particularly if they are using anything but horns. I disagree that low power amps do not have value. Some of the best sounding amps in my experience are low powered designs. The higher powered version of the same amp in many cases ( most cases?) are not going to sound as great as their lower powered brethren. YMMV.
jjss49's avatar
Ag insider logo xs@2x
jjss49
6,612 posts
 
9 wpc is a decent single ended tube amp output, would need to be run with very high efficiency speakers, usually horn loaded units of which there are many good ones

that sub-segment of the high end market has many proponents, most very experienced audiophiles and music lovers...music made by those systems can sound stunningly good

gordon rankin, audio note, audion, cary audio among others are very well known for making lovely amps with low outputs that have great purity

so what’s the big deal and why the belly aching?
More to discover