Several reviews lately about the Denafrips Pontus seem to sync up with what you are looking for.
Thinking about getting a R2R DAC
Dear community,
I currently have a chord qutest DAC. I like it a lot, very full sound, accurate detailed and exciting. However, whenever I go back to vinyl (with a well-recorded nice pressing) I find the sound so much more satisfying. There is a warmth, yes, but there is a presence, a 'there-ness' that I just don't get with the digital. I'm wondering if an R2R DAC would get me closer to that? my budget would be around the same as the qutest. I was looking at the MHDT Orchid or the Border Patrol. Don't get me wrong, I really like the Qutest. I am thinking of putting it in the upstairs system to pair with the Node2i I have up there. Any thoughts? Will analog always just be a different animal than digital?
Currently in the main system I have a Sonore uRendu feeding the Qutest which is going to a LTA MZ2 going to a Pass XA 30.5
thanks!
I currently have a chord qutest DAC. I like it a lot, very full sound, accurate detailed and exciting. However, whenever I go back to vinyl (with a well-recorded nice pressing) I find the sound so much more satisfying. There is a warmth, yes, but there is a presence, a 'there-ness' that I just don't get with the digital. I'm wondering if an R2R DAC would get me closer to that? my budget would be around the same as the qutest. I was looking at the MHDT Orchid or the Border Patrol. Don't get me wrong, I really like the Qutest. I am thinking of putting it in the upstairs system to pair with the Node2i I have up there. Any thoughts? Will analog always just be a different animal than digital?
Currently in the main system I have a Sonore uRendu feeding the Qutest which is going to a LTA MZ2 going to a Pass XA 30.5
thanks!
- ...
- 158 posts total
Post removed |
I can’t believe that someone in this thread tried to state that R2R DACs are “bit perfect”, implying that they’re more accurate than Delta Sigma, which is actually the opposite of the truth.I agree that this Board is often filled with mistruths, bias, ignorance, and the like. But here, you are the one who is appears to be misguided. "Bit Perfect" is a meaningless term. It is meant to imply lack of jitter but with the problems of ringing presented by filtering and the adverse affects of upsampling, it is still meaningless. However, I have to ask, are you confusing "bit perfect" and "bitstream"? Do you know the difference? Personally, I think emphasis on the nature of the converter employed is secondary to the nature of the sampling. This article is informative https://jeffsplace.positive-feedback.com/audio-note-uk-peter-qvortrup-on-making-digital-sources-soun... |
Post removed |
- 158 posts total