Discernment is bad. Self awareness is good.


Looking back along my audiophile arc, I just realized one subtle and profound change that I've experienced, and thought I'd share.

I no longer try to convince others to be discerning so much as self-aware.  Hold on, don't throw your laptop, or start hitting the keys in anger, I'll explain.

When I got into audio, as my anti-fans surely remember, I was a projectionist, later I went to work for a competitor of Dolby's.  During my stint as a projectionist, where dust, scratches, focus and lamp age all played a part in the quality of the experience I learned to be very discerning of these problems.  Anything that could affect the experience was something I watched for constantly.

I also lost a great deal.  I lost the ability to just take in a movie.  Take in the action, take in the relationships forming, the betrayals, the bullets flying overhead.  I'm afraid much of this carried over to my audiophile life, where I was far too critical of the equipment due to self training to listen.

Point is:  Unless you make equipment, or install it, or are trying to trouble shoot discernment is BAD.
Teaching others to hear the difference in cables and power conditioners is also bad to me now.  I don't think we should.  I mean, OK, so, I teach another human who was otherwise perfectly happy listening to Roxy Music with plain cheap interconnects to be unhappy.  How does that help anyone?
Instead now I try to figure out what people like, to listen for themselves and beware those with money to make. I try to find out what they naturally like, where they naturally gravitate to and leave them there.  If they are happy, that's enough.
erik_squires
Wednesday 12:15 PM I was listening to Roxy Music's Country Life (EG Editions CD) on my cheap ($26 used) JVC 310 DVD player! Sounded quite fine! My Marantz CD67 recently died - needs new laser mechanism. And I am just now reading Eric's post! Talk about coincidence! What too many in this hobby forget: it's all about the music!
You make a good point Erik. You're never going to be able to get the best of everything anyway, so why worry overmuch about it? Do the best you can and enjoy what you have, and have accomplished.

And it's a little off your point, but the things you do enjoy, do more of them, even when it's more sensible to do otherwise. For instance should you have a well rounded record collection or should you go overboard on a few artists you really like? There are folks on this site who've hundreds of albums of a single artist, be it Bach or Zappa. My hat's off to them for concentrating on the things they clearly enjoy.

Mike. 
eric, I get your well explained perspective. You can't help a pig discern a silk dome tweeter, as you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. 🐷

<< sarcasm font on>>
I would never ever want to look down at another person like this, unless they fail to vote like I do in which case their moral and personal failures are self-evident.  

<< sarcasm font off >>
To discern is to be able to tell the difference. If its bad to discern, that's saying its bad to make any judgments whatsoever. Everything is just all the same.

And yet at the same time self-awareness is good. But self-awareness is nothing more than the ability to discern the difference between yourself and your experiences. You can't even have self-awareness without being able to discern this difference. It is its very definition.

That you say one is good while the other is bad, without having either the self-awareness or the discernment to realize how inextricably bound together they are, explains much.
Eric,
I am missing your final outcome. Are you able to enjoy recorded music or not. If not, no point in continuing with A-gon. If so, how did you overcome the “discernment” problem?