@bjesien
That’s really interesting. I’m planning to write a paper about audio listening (an academic, philosophy paper) and I’m interested in different approaches.
Would it be safe to say that you try things until you either like them or don’t like them, and if you like something, you at least keep that thing?
The fact that you cycle through amps makes me wonder if
(a) you’ve never found an amp worth keeping for long
or
(b) if amps are a constantly interchangeable element and that even if you get rid of one you like, you know something else will be reasonably equivalent?
The reason I ask is that it would seem that if you found a speaker and amp that were both excellent (and in synergy with one another) they’d be delivering the music to you with enough quality that you’d at least be reluctant to give that up just for the sake of change.
But then again, there is another option to (a) and (b) above, namely,
(c) you may see change as the ultimate goal, here -- which is cool, but it’s rare to see in audio discussions.
That’s really interesting. I’m planning to write a paper about audio listening (an academic, philosophy paper) and I’m interested in different approaches.
Would it be safe to say that you try things until you either like them or don’t like them, and if you like something, you at least keep that thing?
The fact that you cycle through amps makes me wonder if
(a) you’ve never found an amp worth keeping for long
or
(b) if amps are a constantly interchangeable element and that even if you get rid of one you like, you know something else will be reasonably equivalent?
The reason I ask is that it would seem that if you found a speaker and amp that were both excellent (and in synergy with one another) they’d be delivering the music to you with enough quality that you’d at least be reluctant to give that up just for the sake of change.
But then again, there is another option to (a) and (b) above, namely,
(c) you may see change as the ultimate goal, here -- which is cool, but it’s rare to see in audio discussions.