Looking for a vinylesk sounding DAC


I cannot say I wasn’t satisfied with my system.

Laptop (Quobuz Studio) - > Schiit Bifrost 2 - > Ocellia Reference RCA - > Werner Acoustics, Selene (active tube preamp using two VT-231 from RCA) - > passive preamp - > Ocellia Reference RCA - > First Watt F6 dual mono custom built - > HEDD Audio’s "Heddphone" / Hifiman HE 4

From the beginning I started to built it I had a quite concrete idea of what it should sound like in the end: vinylesk without using vinyl. It took me a while to get there and now I really thought I got it: Due to the F6 the outcome is brutally powerful and incredibly fast while the tube stage adds lots of body, depth and a rich organic undertone. Finally the RCA’s from Ocellia were adding the fine raffinement and a nice holographic soundstage. Nothing smears, in just every situation everything stays transparent, well controlled/articulated and the separation is just excellent.

BUT when listening to streamed vinyl I still feel the need for action - I just want EVERY track from quobuz to sound like this. Please take just some seconds and listen to this:

https://musicandvinyl.blogspot.com/2020/08/haruomi-hosono-from-aegean-sea.html?m=1

There is just MORE elasticity, MORE tonal density, MORE plankton, MORE concentration to the point, MORE light-footedness and MORE palpability (compared to a "disdainful" quobuz stream). Do you know what I mean?

I still think and hope a new dac could be the nirvana-solution. But which one would manage the job to sound just like vinyl (99% would be ok...)?

Happy to hear your suggestions!
barrista0611
Cleeds,

The quote with Plankton in it was me quoting someone else.


My comment about wicked high noise floor, etc. was in relation to the link the op posted. That is the sound he wants. I stand by my comments the recording at that link. CD is not inherently compressed. If it is, that was a mixing/mastering decisions whereas on vinyl that was often a necessity. 


 Vinyl is a "sound" and it is desired by many audiophiles especially those that grew up with it and young people increasing feeling less involved and a less and less tactile world.  However, you would be hard pressed to find a serious recording engineer who went through the transition from 80's analog to 2000's digital who will not tell you that digital sounds like what comes off the microphone, tape and digital do not.  I mean people who worked in mid-high end studios with access to good quality analog and digital gear.  That does not mean they will like the digital sound better. It just means it is accurate.
Honest question ... I've heard this many times before that the ultimate goal is to recreate the recording environment and/or the artist and recording engineer's intent. Is there an inside track on which I'm not that allows some people to figure out the exact intent? I sure can't.
@jjss49 Thanks a lot for the link to that very similar thread. Really helpful and even more to consider. I will look further at the units from MHDT and Holo Audio. 

Yeah its obvious. He should try to meditate a bit ... ;] 
Can someone comment on orchid VS pagoda? I used to have a Lector Strumenti CDP 707 that was using PCM 1704 with a pair of ECC 81 tubes. Loved it a lot but I'd like a DAC with a different chip now which leads me more to the orchid. 
Talk to user @grannyring about the modifications that he performs on the Orchid DACs. I highly recommend that that you have it modified by him if you purchase one.