From what I gather tube dacs can be left on without worry. The tube or tubes in such a dac normally aren't designed to be taxed that much while in use. So typically the tube may last 5 to 7 years or more depending on the design of the unit.
Plus the tubes are cheap ..so not a big deal.
As far as the price goes. You must also look at whether the product comes from a retailer or straight from the manufacture. The price vs performance may prove a moot point in this case. Since an additional mark up is a part of the retail price.
From what I've heard and read the technology hasn't changed all that much. I prefer NON oversampling to the much hyped upsampling and oversampling. It may seem primitive but once you listen and compare you will understand it's not.
IMHO it's more about the design of the unit than whether it upsamples ,oversamples or does neither.
A friend and I did a little experiment a few nights back.
We used an Arcam DV27 as a transport .First we used a simple non oversampling Dac with a EE minimax. The listening lasted maybe an hour or so. Then we used a processor/preamp made by Lexicon. The Lexicon when new retailed for $4000. The little Dac less than 1/10 the price.
Now some would figure the Lexicon with all it's powerful processing and Dacs should embarass such a inexpensive Dac.
Wrong..LOL.. the differences were very noticeable. The Lexicon sounded compressed and cymbals sounded like hash.
It was terrible! I honestly couldn't help but laugh at the difference. Even a person not in the hobby would have noticed it within seconds of firing the unit up.
The little cheapo no frills Dac offered much better range in the music. Nothing seemed to be held back. No hash or grain also. My friend sat back and laughed about the whole situation. He was a very good sport and owns the processor that was just trounced by the Dac. He knew before I that it was no contest. IMHO anything can be over done..just keep it as simple as possible.
Plus the tubes are cheap ..so not a big deal.
As far as the price goes. You must also look at whether the product comes from a retailer or straight from the manufacture. The price vs performance may prove a moot point in this case. Since an additional mark up is a part of the retail price.
From what I've heard and read the technology hasn't changed all that much. I prefer NON oversampling to the much hyped upsampling and oversampling. It may seem primitive but once you listen and compare you will understand it's not.
IMHO it's more about the design of the unit than whether it upsamples ,oversamples or does neither.
A friend and I did a little experiment a few nights back.
We used an Arcam DV27 as a transport .First we used a simple non oversampling Dac with a EE minimax. The listening lasted maybe an hour or so. Then we used a processor/preamp made by Lexicon. The Lexicon when new retailed for $4000. The little Dac less than 1/10 the price.
Now some would figure the Lexicon with all it's powerful processing and Dacs should embarass such a inexpensive Dac.
Wrong..LOL.. the differences were very noticeable. The Lexicon sounded compressed and cymbals sounded like hash.
It was terrible! I honestly couldn't help but laugh at the difference. Even a person not in the hobby would have noticed it within seconds of firing the unit up.
The little cheapo no frills Dac offered much better range in the music. Nothing seemed to be held back. No hash or grain also. My friend sat back and laughed about the whole situation. He was a very good sport and owns the processor that was just trounced by the Dac. He knew before I that it was no contest. IMHO anything can be over done..just keep it as simple as possible.