are 4000$ /pr speakers today better than $4000/pr speakers from mid to late 1990's?


or 5k or 2k or 10k??
back then i was in love with:
thiel cs3.6,, cs 2 2s, 7s and even owned a pair of 1.6swilson audio tiny tots and watt puppiesapogee grandsb&w matrix 802's and 801'sb&w silver signatures - but for some things not everything
so lets say you could get 801's for $5500/pr back then, is a $5000/pr b&w today as good as the 801's then?
thanks.
ps - i do know that now my ears are probably not as good as they were when i was younger.

sgrue
 Inflation!
The U.S. dollar experienced an average inflation rate of 2.09% per year during this period, causing the real value of a dollar to decrease. In other words, $4,000 in 2000 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $6,045.99 in 2020, a difference of $2,045.99 over 20 years. The 2000 inflation rate was 3.36%.
Specifically to B&W I’d unequivocally say buy the newer speakers.  I find their newest tweeter and midrange drivers to be far superior to those of 90s vintage. 
Here is something interesting. In the last ten years i have owned Devore, Audio Note, Harbeth, B&W, KEF, Tekton DI`s and Magico speakers with prices ranging from 4k to 19k and while all were good to very good i was never 100% happy. Recently i came across a nice pair of Wilson Watt Puppy 5.1`s for 4k and i will tell you in my home and paired to my system the 20 year old 4k(todays used price) Wilsons out perform all of the above mentioned speakers.

I know 20 years ago the Wilsons were something like 17k but at todays used prices they are out performing some of todays new 17k speakers.
@soix ,
Have you read the latest Stereophile review of the B&W 705?
There are some interesting comments regarding old and new  BandW's.
B
speaker design has advanced a lot, materials got better but i feel that in many modern cases tuning is missing.
G