That’s good, but there is still not much to bank on with the MF amp regarding how it handles even 6 ohms nominal even with dips below that. So that still leaves things open perhaps to a significant extent. 6 ohms nominal may be a harder load than 8 ohms nominal with some dips...it all depends. You would have to try them with an amp known to be stable into 4 ohms which in most cases mean an amp spec’ed and preferably measured for 8 ohms that also doubles power as much as possible into 4. The MF might do that pretty well but there is nothing concrete to bank on that it would so far. If it could, you would think MF would document it and make the amp more appealing for more cases. Also the bass control offered by the very efficient Class D amps could still deliver a big difference alone. OR even a Class a/b with good documented performance into 4 ohms. Could even be Class A but that could get very big bulky and expensive to deliver the watts needed for headroom with less efficient speakers going louder.
On the other note, I have considered a miniDSP for use with my KEF ls50s and Klipsch sw308 sub and liked it very much so very interested in how that works out.
If we weren't such sound anal audio buffs we wouldn't even care about these details. We'd just say hey we have a good enough system and call it a day. Off course, no self respecting audio kook would EVER do that right?
On the other note, I have considered a miniDSP for use with my KEF ls50s and Klipsch sw308 sub and liked it very much so very interested in how that works out.
If we weren't such sound anal audio buffs we wouldn't even care about these details. We'd just say hey we have a good enough system and call it a day. Off course, no self respecting audio kook would EVER do that right?