Warm romantic & detailed
Have you rolled the tubes in the preamp yet? Mac uses JJs which sound great until you hear better tubes. JJs can be harsh and grainy. For line only testing, try a new Gold Lion 12AX7 in position 5 and one of these in position 6. Also make sure position 6 has an at7 not an ax7 in place. I read a report of a factory error. |
Just thought I'd update all of you chaps. Sold my Focal's, feeling a little bittersweet about it, but time moves on. So far I've auditioned the Focal Spectral 40th, Harbeth 40.3, Sonus Faber heritage iii. Question: obviously there is a difference between the harbeth 40.1 / 2 and 3rs. I believe I've been told the 40.2 share pretty much the same components as the 3's. Obviously I'm not selling out 18k for a new pair of 3's, so I'm leaning towards the used market. I've found a great price on the 40.1's, but searching a little deeper and opening up my wallet a little more I could land a pair of the 40.2s... So my question is: would I regret buying the 40.1's and not going for the 40.2's? By the way hearing the harbeth 40.3 was a life changing experience. I was also Extremely impressed with the sonus faber heritage iii, and the focal spectral 40's where also very impressive |
I've only heard the 40.2s (amazing!), so can't comment on the differences between .1, .2 and .3, but I would be surprised if they were significant. I'd suggest checking out the Harbeth User Group - https://www.harbeth.co.uk/usergroup/. There may be some folks there that have heard the different versions. |
@jeffinnh76 There are significant differences between the .1 and the .2/.3. The crossover in the 40.2 was changed to make it more living-room friendly. The 40.1 could boom in too small rooms or when not carefully positioned. The differences between the 40.2 regular, 40.2 Anniversary, and 40.3 XD are insignificant, and have more to do with marketing than performance. A NOS/NIB/demo 40.2 is the purchaser's sweet spot. |
