Acoustics and reverberation time


Hi everyone,

We often talk about room modes or first reflections but few talk about a major reason for treating a room: reverb time.

Reverberation time is the amount of time an audio signal stays active in a room. An anechoic test chamber has no reverb, since only the source signal can be heard. We often measure reverb time with the measure RT60. That is, how long in time until the signal has decayed by 60 dB. We divide this into multiple bands so we can evaluate room treatment in mid-bass, mid, treble separately, but there is also the question of how smoothly it decays. Signals should decay randomly but smoothly. Peaks indicate an echo. Multiple peaks a slap echo. Too little reverb and you end up with a very dry sounding room, with no ambience.

What does this affect? It is like a TV or computer monitor’s pixel. Imagine the screen having a memory of all the previous pixels, like the screen starts to turn grey or blue based on what you saw a few frames ago. So, it blurs the signal. It also colors the signal. A room with excess mid/treble reverb can make every speaker seem like it lacks bass when the reality is that there is too much mid/treble in the room. A side effect of this is that speakers sound harsh when you turn up the volume. Of course, this is subjective, as you can overload a speaker, but when you are using relatively little power and the sound quality changes, it is often excess treble reverb time.

One curious experiment which will make you a believer in reverb time is to treat bare wooden floors between or behind the speakers with pillows or blankets. Why does this help the mid/treble? Well, reverb time. :)

Perhaps now we can imagine why diffusion works. Instead of being pure absorbers, they scatter the sound. They help maintain the reverb time but prevent these coherent, regular reflections. So when we are looking at room treatment we are attempting a combination of many traits. Controlling early reflections, and maintaining a diffuse, rapidly decaying (but not too rapidly) sound field, in addition to managing room modes.

At the gross level, your room acoustics are tone controls. You are playing with the mid/treble balance, and at the finest levels they are helping to localize sounds and provide an enjoyable playing field for your music.

This should also help you understand somewhat why equalizer solutions, including Digital Signal Processing (DSP) based like automatic room correction or DIRAC, etc. can only work up to a point, and why having good room treatment widens the sweet spot, and makes these tools work over a broader physical area.
erik_squires
If i dare to give an image of my actual ceiling room all people here will write a petition to include me on a free psychiatric treatment list....

Then trust me i look like a nut in my room...

I dont give a dam, my room was always set to be the tool for my audio dream...

For sure after all these 2 years my hundred of experiments contribute all with inequal value to my actual S.Q. Nobody was there next to me to give me a clue about what to do, except buy this or that, in general with the money i never have...

Sometimes one of my device were disconnected by accident, or by me for an experiment, and the result were the audible clues and values of each one of my experiments...

Classical audio treatment for example cannot replace many devices effects, like Helmholtz resonators, or non-Helmholtz resonators, or stones or crystals installation, or Schumann generators grid, or my golden plate grid etc....How in the world a connected by cable array of resonators can have an audible effect ? Classical acoustic dont deal with nut people like me....But anyway i keep what is working....

For example my last discovery was that ears dont like the empty convex corner of my audio room, but prefer a polyhedral flowing shape.... Is there a classical acoustical book that recommend that? perhaps but it is not orthodox ordinary practice in usual audio thread....

Also i dont have a mathematically measuring rod to objectively evaluate the final value of each of the device i tried or create.... It is my ears who was the judge of which will be the next road to take and which one to cancel....My goal was timbre instrument natural rendition with holographic imaging....i succeed and that was my goal....

Merry Christmas to you millercarbon and to all....





Tweaks aside you can get great sound and a great RT60 with plants, natural furnishings, a mix of natural diffraction and of course absorption ( which you can hide behind artwork, etc... )
see my system pictures of Casa Pacifica which achieves almost textbook perfect control room targets for RT60
and has plenty of WAF.
many of your cherished recordings probably exist because somebody cared enough to study acoustics and more...
By the way i am sure that you are right Tomic....It is better for WAF also for sure....I dont ask for anyone to take exactly the same road i did.... I only ask people to have faith also in their own creative power....

Merry Christmas to you Tomic....




There doesn't even seem to be any evidence that the traditional acoustic approach is any better.

When the flat earth society takes over your discussion, it's time to pack it in.
Maghister you might get something out of Olson’s book, my dog eared copy came from a library ( retired ) . A lovely book that covers entire rooms shaped as your corners. Merry Christmas to you as well !
MC is right....why would anyone want to implement basic acoustic principles like bass absorption and diffusion when they can alternatively just hang some crystals from the ceiling?  Afterall, what evidence is there that absorbing bass nodes diffusing first reflections actually does anything better?  lol   Seriously folks....you can't make up this stuff that MC says....thank goodness he does it for us and saves us from unnecessary acid trips.  

Look...I'm not dismissing anything that mahgister implements nor the results they may present.  But you don't implement them in lieu of basic acoustic principles....unless you're trying to sell something.  Hmmmm...

Agree with tomic601 here....Erik is offering "sound" advice.