If i dare to give an image of my actual ceiling room all people here will write a petition to include me on a free psychiatric treatment list....
Then trust me i look like a nut in my room...
I dont give a dam, my room was always set to be the tool for my audio dream...
For sure after all these 2 years my hundred of experiments contribute all with inequal value to my actual S.Q. Nobody was there next to me to give me a clue about what to do, except buy this or that, in general with the money i never have...
Sometimes one of my device were disconnected by accident, or by me for an experiment, and the result were the audible clues and values of each one of my experiments...
Classical audio treatment for example cannot replace many devices effects, like Helmholtz resonators, or non-Helmholtz resonators, or stones or crystals installation, or Schumann generators grid, or my golden plate grid etc....How in the world a connected by cable array of resonators can have an audible effect ? Classical acoustic dont deal with nut people like me....But anyway i keep what is working....
For example my last discovery was that ears dont like the empty convex corner of my audio room, but prefer a polyhedral flowing shape.... Is there a classical acoustical book that recommend that? perhaps but it is not orthodox ordinary practice in usual audio thread....
Also i dont have a mathematically measuring rod to objectively evaluate the final value of each of the device i tried or create.... It is my ears who was the judge of which will be the next road to take and which one to cancel....My goal was timbre instrument natural rendition with holographic imaging....i succeed and that was my goal....
Merry Christmas to you millercarbon and to all....
Merry Christmas to you Tomic....
Then trust me i look like a nut in my room...
I dont give a dam, my room was always set to be the tool for my audio dream...
For sure after all these 2 years my hundred of experiments contribute all with inequal value to my actual S.Q. Nobody was there next to me to give me a clue about what to do, except buy this or that, in general with the money i never have...
Sometimes one of my device were disconnected by accident, or by me for an experiment, and the result were the audible clues and values of each one of my experiments...
Classical audio treatment for example cannot replace many devices effects, like Helmholtz resonators, or non-Helmholtz resonators, or stones or crystals installation, or Schumann generators grid, or my golden plate grid etc....How in the world a connected by cable array of resonators can have an audible effect ? Classical acoustic dont deal with nut people like me....But anyway i keep what is working....
For example my last discovery was that ears dont like the empty convex corner of my audio room, but prefer a polyhedral flowing shape.... Is there a classical acoustical book that recommend that? perhaps but it is not orthodox ordinary practice in usual audio thread....
Also i dont have a mathematically measuring rod to objectively evaluate the final value of each of the device i tried or create.... It is my ears who was the judge of which will be the next road to take and which one to cancel....My goal was timbre instrument natural rendition with holographic imaging....i succeed and that was my goal....
Merry Christmas to you millercarbon and to all....
Tweaks aside you can get great sound and a great RT60 with plants, natural furnishings, a mix of natural diffraction and of course absorption ( which you can hide behind artwork, etc... )By the way i am sure that you are right Tomic....It is better for WAF also for sure....I dont ask for anyone to take exactly the same road i did.... I only ask people to have faith also in their own creative power....
see my system pictures of Casa Pacifica which achieves almost textbook perfect control room targets for RT60
and has plenty of WAF.
many of your cherished recordings probably exist because somebody cared enough to study acoustics and more...
Merry Christmas to you Tomic....