Does Anyone Think CD is Better Than Vinyl/Analog?

That is odd audio2design, I thought you liked listening to eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. That folks is the Beatles White Album :-)  

Anyone who generalizes insisting that one format is ALWAYS better than an other is usually OTL. Digital obviously has a large advantage over any analog format including R2R. This does not mean that analog sources can not sound superior under the right circumstances. So, as many of us insist, it depends. There is no question that digital is more convenient but if convenience is your main issue then you might as well buy a table radio. 
Acoustic Sounds did not stop offering Digital Downloads because of declining sales. I stopped buying downloads from them because I find HD Tracks site much more convenient. I do buy a lot of records from Acoustic Sounds. I really think they are quite happy selling vinyl as they have increase their presence by buying Classic Records.   
For certain Streaming is taking a large segment of the market. I think young people like this format. I do not. I prefer collecting music. I do not to have to filter through a forest of awful music. 
I love turntables. I grew up with them so, there is an emotional connection that I will never give up.   

In my opinion some CDs sound better than vinyl records and some records sound better than CDs. It's easier to get a great sound from CDs without breaking the bank. It's not the same with vinyl. 

Bottom line for me, it's all about the music. 

I cannot comment on CD sound, but since you included all digital I can share how my records compare to hi-res streaming.  I abandoned CDs 15 years ago when a friend did some A-B comparisons of a few albums on his system.  We both had decent systems...solid state separates with floor standers(total system ~$10k MSRP).  I had no records at all and bought a turntable and began my journey down the groove.  Now, 15 years later, my system has grown along with my collection.  I recently took a chance on an integrated and was surprised how much I liked it in comparison to my separates.  It is a hybrid with tube amplification along with a well regarded DAC.  I got a Node2i a couple weeks ago and have been listening via Tidal and Amazon Music HD.  Tidal would always drop with hi-res files and only play consistently with CD files.  I am now on Amazon and it is a superior user experience and the sound seems the same.  I like how millercarbon described it....background.  When I am upstairs hanging out with my 8yo daughter, it is nice to have the digital and not going up and down the stairs to flip records.  Without exception, whenever I am in my seat and experiencing the soundstage, records win.  It is kind of like soda.  I quit buying soda at the grocery over a decade ago.  I would occasionally get one when indulging on fast food.  The past few years I almost have to spit out the first drink so I never get them anymore.  My ears have not had digital music through my speakers in years and oh my gosh....whenever I switch over it is sooo bright and tinny!!  The fatigue is immediate.  I plan to keep my Node2i as it opens up the door to listen to music I don't yet own and it also makes things simpler when cooking or upstairs.  If the playing field is somewhat level between the two sources, then I cannot imagine digital ever sounding better.  I think some people have a mental block for the time and care it takes to own and enjoy vinyl.  If digital makes you happy then you are lucky, but I think you owe it to yourself to give vinyl a chance.  After all...we do tweaks and upgrades just to hear the faintest audible justification.  Well, digital to vinyl is by far the best tweak I ever made to my system.  

Oh boy...

I have about a dozen recordings in both vinyl and digital.  There things about each medium I like better than the other, so I would say that neither is superior.  They are different.

The big downside to vinyl is that it is expensive to get done right and digital costs a tiny fraction of that.  It's not the CD player that is important.  It's the DAC you're running through that counts.  CD players all buy their transports from the same very few vendors, so obsessing about transports is foolish.  The difference in cost between one CD player and another is in the DAC and the appearance of the cabinet.

I've been running a Peachtree DAC-iT for years now and I'm very happy with it.  I got a chance one day to do some serious comparisons between it, a Schitt Yggy and a PS Audio DirectStream.   Half the listeners that day actually liked the Peachtree best.   I preferred the PS Audio DirectStream a bit, but not $6000 more.  The Schitt sounded like...  Sorry Schitt lovers.

I run a pro grade Tascam CD-200 player and take an optical feed from it to my Peachtree.    I also have ripped all of my CDs to flac format and play them off of a laptop PC into the Peachtree.  Sounds identical, as it should.  Exotic digital cabling is totally BS.  The benefit of digital is that it's just data and is either transmitted or it's not.

My recommendation is to do as I do and run a pro grade CD player with optical output to the DAC of your choice, which can switch to USB from a laptop PC.  You can either rip your CDs to wav or flac format and play off the PC, or just stream directly off the Internet from a service like Tidal.

As for vinyl, I recommend getting into it unless you're already deep into it, in which case you're already doomed.   I bought my first record back when Lyndon Johnson was president and have far too many records to pitch 'em all out, aside from the many I love which are not available on digital, so I have to have a good turntable.   

Good luck!