Speaker sensitivity vs SQ

Costs for high-eff drivers are greater, Size high- eff designs are larger can cost more to build ship take up more room at dealers and distributors. And I will also add that buyers don't want changes. And they have been told for decades that all horns are problematic and they bought the line that small is better. Face it would you buy a toaster that was better than others but was larger and looked not like a toaster? We are simple tools and want to blend in and conform with others not to stand out.

What are the T3’s sold for - close to $100k? Re: mentioned "better interface" it reminds of what Simon Mears told me of the importance of the coupling between the compression driver exit and the throat of the horn it’s mounted to; transition, transition, transition - as he put it.

@phusis As I understand it, my speakers are currently about $33,000/pair. Mr. Mears is correct. The coupling was optimized on a computer and the result is very smooth and seamless. People often comment on hearing T3s (and T1s) that the speakers sound more like ESLs in that they are so fast and seamless. IOW no ’horn artifact’ at all.


Regarding the SETs, IMO/IME their main advantage is that as the power is reduced, the distortion decreases linearly to unmeasurable. This is important because (to trot out an old expression) it really is all about that first watt. But just so you know, this character is not unique to SETs, although it is rare in push-pull amplifiers. But you can imagine since I’m writing this that I know of a few amps which share this important characteristic. But one **disadvantage** of SETs is that their primary distortion product is the 2nd harmonic, as well as low power and troubles making bandwidth due to the output transformer.


Now we all know that the 2nd harmonic is innocuous in that the ear is insensitive to it (and because the ear converts all forms of distortion into tonality, it assigns the quality of ’warmth’ and ’bloom’ to this one). However, the ear assigns this same quality to the 3rd harmonic as well, but there is an important distinction. Circuits that have a 2nd harmonic as their primary distortion product mathematically have what is known as a ’quadratic non-linearity’. Its not so important to know the math, but if you feel like working it out what you will see is that harmonic orders above the 2nd decrease rather slowly as compared to a circuit that has a ’cubic non-linearity’ (produces the 3rd as the primary distortion component). An amplifier that has this quality has its distortion decreasing much faster as the order of the harmonic is increased! This is important since the ear uses higher ordered harmonics to sense sound pressure (and assigns the quality of harshness and brightness to them). IOW, an amplifier with a cubic non-linearity will sound more detailed (because distortion masks low level detail) and **smoother** because the higher ordered harmonics are at a lower level.

In terms of circuit design an amplifier with this characteristic must be fully differential and balanced from input to output. In this way even orders are cancelled with each stage in the amp (instead of being compounded), leaving the 3rd as the primary distortion component, at about 1/10th what you would get with a single-ended circuit, assuming that neither employs any feedback.

Now if you mix single-ended and push-pull, you wind up with a prominent 5th harmonic in addition to a 2nd and a 3rd (put another way an amp like this has **both** cubic and quadratic non-linearities). This is why many people prefer SETs, but those same people find that if they hear an amp with similar concepts (triode, class A, zero feedback) executed fully differential, that it has all the desirable properties of SETs without a downside. BTW this difference is easy to hear (its not subtle) and of course its also easy to measure.

Atma-Sphere that sound great but is way above my pay grade. But, I think you just explained why I like Pass and Curl amps so much?
Phusis, those are quite some speakers you have. What are you using for subs? They must be unusual to keep up with your main speakers.

@mijostyn  I don't know about Curl's designs so much, but Nelson does make fully differential amplifiers so he is able to take advantage of the lower distortion afforded, and yet have a nice 3rd to help mask the higher orders.

My opinion of speakers is very jaded now. I've been living with large ESLs for so long that most other speakers sound.....small, even if they go loud.
I find horn loaded designs very interesting but I have yet to hear one that I would consider. I have not heard Ralph's speakers, I'm sure they are excellent. I have heard a few at shows that were not impressive, but what ever is at a show. Some of the older Horn loaded speakers like Altecs and JBLs that I had a lot of experience with when I was young were all very colored. Back then K horns were the best but they did not image well and though not as colored as the other horn speakers you still knew you were listening to horns. Frankly, I liked the Cornwall better than the K horn.
I owned Heresy's for 10 years and for a teenage rocker with a Dynakit Stereo 70 they were great until I got Large Advents and a Phase Linear 700. The Advents were more natural and imaged very nicely. 
The Heresy's were the last and only horn speakers I ever owned. The problem is there are painfully few situations where you can hear them in a controlled situation. Some of them are very large, very expensive and few dealers are going to keep them on the floor. 
Those of us here have gone down our own path and become entrenched in one technology or another and always seem to think ours is best.
There is no single best. There are thousands of bests. Since we can't hear all of these systems it is fun to talk about them and hear about what other people are doing. In many instance you might learn something that you can apply to your own system.