SPL Levels and Perceived Loudness


I have two main systems, the Tekton Moabs and Magnepan 3.7's.  In addition I have trialed a variety of other speakers including the Vandersteen 2ce. KEF LS50, Zu Audio Omen, and Spatial Audio M1.  Before each listening session I always set the levels to 75 dB using pink noise and a SPL meter sitting next to my chair.  The perceived loudness of the Moabs and 3.7's matches pretty closely at the same level but all of the other, smaller, speakers sound quite a bit softer and in order for the perceived loudness to be similar I have to boost the levels by 3-7 dB.  So I have two questions.

1) Why would this be true?  Is there something about the area of the radiating speaker surface or size of the front of the speakers that somehow impacts how I perceive the same measured SPL volume?  Is it because I am using pink noise to set levels?

2) One of the reasons to set the SPL levels at 75 dB is to minimize the risk of any hearing loss.  If I turn up the measured dB to 80+ with the smaller speakers but it is perceived the same as 75 db on the bigger speakers does that increase the risk of listening ?


pinwa
1) Why would this be true? Is there something about the area of the radiating speaker surface or size of the front of the speakers that somehow impacts how I perceive the same measured SPL volume? Is it because I am using pink noise to set levels?

More likely its because your ears are not microphones. More to the point, our sensation of hearing volume is nothing like what a meter measures.

Meters measure atmospheric energy. They are directional, and they are linear. At least compared to our ears they are linear. Do a search for Fletcher-Munson equal loudness contours to see graphically just how NON linear our hearing is.

Mainly though I think the difference is because what we hear and perceive as volume is the sum total of all the sound in the room. Your meter is pointed straight at the speakers. Your ears are pointed straight off to the sides. The meter is highly directional. Your ears are highly omnidirectional.

Just one of the many, many reasons I determined long ago that meters are at least as likely to mislead and harm as enlighten and help.

2) One of the reasons to set the SPL levels at 75 dB is to minimize the risk of any hearing loss. If I turn up the measured dB to 80+ with the smaller speakers but it is perceived the same as 75 db on the bigger speakers does that increase the risk of listening ?

Yeah well there’s a new one: "the risk of listening"! What about the enjoyment of listening, eh?

If you’re really afraid of hearing loss well then I’m afraid I have some bad news: you are gonna have hearing loss. It gets worse as we get older. Fact of life.

But here’s another fact of life: we gain experience. Little kids hear way better than we do. But would you rely on one to evaluate anything audio? I don’t think so. My hearing on the other hand, when I play my test CD it keeps sweeping up the frequencies long past the point it tapered off into dead silence, for me. Yet I think you would agree I somehow have managed to put together a pretty darn fine system.

So hearing ain’t all that. Listening is. Hearing is bio-mechanical. Listening is an intellectual activity. Two related yet fundamentally completely different things.

But high volume levels can do real damage over time. Very high levels. Very long time. Also the type or nature of the sound matters a lot. Riding in a car might be only about 75dB but its steady wind and road noise and that is a lot worse than music that might measure an average 75 but contain peaks to 95 while being below 70 a lot of the time.

You should come back again when you get the chance. Sounds way, way better now. Like you would not believe how much better. Like the same stuff had you longing for more afterwards? Well now there’s way more of that. Just maybe next time less talking trying to figure out what might be going on, more time listening absorbing what actually is going on. I will meet you half way and get out my trusty Radio Shack SPL meter so we can quantify exactly how much damage (enjoyment) the Moabs are dishing out. What do you say?
@pinwa, it is most likely a difference in frequency response. Trust the meter. As for hearing damage that is also frequency dependent. The high frequency fibers in your ears are the most sensitive. If you have good hearing you can listen at higher levels if you warm up your ears slowly. Start at a lower level say 75 dB and work your way up 5 dB at a time every 5 minutes or so. As you do this a little muscle attached to your little ear bones (the stapedius) contacts and dampens sound conduction effectively lowering the volume to your inner ear. This is why impulse noises like gun shots are the most damaging. Your ears do not get enough time to accommodate. Warming my ears up I am very comfortable at 95 dB on my meter. Meters may not read all the same. If you are comfortable and your ears do not wind up ringing you are probably OK. Ringing is always a bad sign. Many rock concerts attain levels over 105 dB which will make anybody's ears ring. I always take a set of musician's ear plugs (Etymotic) to concerts just in case.
@mijostyn, would you say spl meters will predominately pick up on a bass drum or kick drum if one is present?  This has been my impression and perhaps why 1 set of speakers with a stronger bottom end and laid back signature sounds quieter than a bass shy, midrange pronounced speaker at the same spl level...