Perfect Path "Solutions" (PPS) eMat

Well designed turntables and electronic gear to not need any voodoo witchcraft to operate correctly. 

Vibrations are not affecting PERFECT audio system design then...
The electrical  noise floor of the house and room dont affect PERFECT  audio system...
 
"Any audio design is optimal by virtue of his PERFECT design out of the box: connect it, he will work perfectly  optimally WITHOUT  any external means or optimizing device controls..."


 
You call that "science" or market gullability about alleged PERFECT engineering ?

Myself i chose the second case....

• "You have these right papa? ... Go get one, the mat, and look at the surface. Quite obviously that came off a real production line, and not someone’s basement shop. How do you think these things are manufactured?"

Do you read the posts of others, or is your super inflated ego too large to enable you to see past your nose??

I shared with you exactly what the mats were in a previous post. Tim DID NOT manufacture the mats. He only used the mats as a vehicle for his product. Scroll back up and you’ll find "The Secret."

< Sheesh! >

Frank

Ah! They are refrigerator magnets.

Anyone partaking in this senseless thread should put a cold towel around their head and wake up embarrassed about it the next morning

So what you are saying is you have no clue. Look at your own post Opapa......

***** I believe *****   that the same technology was used in the mats as was used in the PPT Total Contact contact enhancer. Judicial use of Tim Mrock’s graphene formula under the label of the mat. And as for the mat itself, ***** I believe that it was the same material as that used for refrigerator magnets. *****  And yes, the mat material can be bought through Internet suppliers. However, the graphene formula used in developing the PPT mats died with Tim Mrock ... the genius who came up with all of these great ideas.

PPT did not make "graphene", they incorporated graphene into a carrier/solvent.  They didn't have a graphene formula, they had a formula for a carrier/binder used in the contact enhancer. They would have bought the graphene. Judicial use under the label .... sure, that is why the mat is pretty flat on the label side??   You would have had better luck claiming it was on the other side, where it was a flat but a bit bubbly on the first one, but flatter but grittier on the "upgrade".  There are a ton of proper EMI absorbing mats on the market that use graphite, and ferrous particles depending on operation method. I will give you 3 reasons why they don't use graphene and cost and too difficult to manufacture are not it.