So what you are saying is you have no clue. Look at your own post Opapa......
***** I believe ***** that the same technology was used in the mats as was used in
the PPT Total Contact contact enhancer. Judicial use of Tim Mrock’s
graphene formula under the label of the mat. And as for the mat itself, ***** I
believe that it was the same material as that used for refrigerator
magnets. ***** And yes, the mat material can be bought through Internet
suppliers. However, the graphene formula used in developing the PPT mats
died with Tim Mrock ... the genius who came up with all of these great
ideas.
PPT did not make "graphene", they incorporated graphene into a carrier/solvent. They didn't have a graphene formula, they had a formula for a carrier/binder used in the contact enhancer. They would have bought the graphene. Judicial use under the label .... sure, that is why the mat is pretty flat on the label side?? You would have had better luck claiming it was on the other side, where it was a flat but a bit bubbly on the first one, but flatter but grittier on the "upgrade". There are a ton of proper EMI absorbing mats on the market that use graphite, and ferrous particles depending on operation method. I will give you 3 reasons why they don't use graphene and cost and too difficult to manufacture are not it.
