Perfect Path "Solutions" (PPS) eMat

^^^ Oh, and I forgot to mention ... those reflective blinds received the copper foil treatment too. I used small pieces so unless pointed out, one would never know they are there. 

Frank

You are not passionate you are dogmatic and lazy and too interested in hearing yourself talk to listen to what anyone else says. That’s why you repeat the same rambling monologue over and over. I have never "attacked" analog lovers only the dogmatic idea it is "superior" not just preferable to them personally. If you are stuck in the mindset it is technically superior that is out of ignorance willful or otherwise. That hires digital can copy analog perfectly should make this obvious.

I will make the hypothesis that you are right and that i was wrong about that and about analog lover... And i will suppose that like you said you never accuse them to be ignorant...Anyway you even cannot repeat my argument  about timbre perception  in relation to mic recording and dont even understand them or dont want to ....




 But think now about the content of your post just here...

It lack some other information...no? 

Answering my post you truncate it of some information....

 Remember, you bashed indisciminately also all audiophiles and particularly those who add "tweaks" to their system ?

Then you certainly attack tweakers audiophile in mass in the other thread with mijostyn laughing about their ignorance and "snake oil" products and here you attacked oregonpapa....Remember?

Even if you may or may be not right about me, and about turntable " ignorant", or not so, analog lover you cannot erase completely all reality written here....

I am not perfect, but you are certainly not more perfect than me....

Take the " harsh" medecine you wanted to offer to others and quit the arguing... I will mute myself also....

Challenging assertions made with limited facts is not attacking people. It’s the proper way to discern facts and acquire knowledge. Though often it devolves into that.  Real Knowledge  is always based on discerning facts.   

Challenging assertions made with limited facts is not attacking people.

i will correct your distorted translation of event....

Challenging people experience and testimonies which are "limited facts", yes, but they are anyway facts, with no experience with the product whatsoever, even no knowledge at all about the content of this product, is not challenging but criticizing people with no facts at all... Not even limited one....
Then bashing someone room, speakers, and integrity after that to go on with the ridiculizing of the same product deconsider any form of seriousness...

Real Knowledge is always based on discerning facts.

Try that yourself....