Which speakers did you find bright, fatiguing or just disappointing in some way?

@hilde45
I totally agree with you, it is human nature. And I’m certainly not disputing the validity of your post/reference.

We live comfortably as long as our human nature sensibilities agree. Unfortunately, when our human natures differ, in extreme cases we slaughter one another. (And everything in between.)

Fortunately, most of us can sort ourselves out to some degree and keep our darkest nature at bay. Even small things like respecting each other on an audio discussion board is a step closer. 

My point is it’s not cool to develop a habit of abusing others. It hurts feelings and is unsettling, especially to tender hearted people. I think those who do it online, do it offline, they just have to choose victims more carefully.

How is it odd that some people dont like the sound of a speaker? It happens with every speaker.

It's not odd at all, but you have predictably produced yet another dishonest straw man. I responded to a specific objection to the speaker, not a broad one. 

Why don't you do readers a favor now, and stop polluting this thread with your biased, and frequently dishonest posts. 

Making a list asap!!

 I responded to a specific objection to the speaker, not a broad one.

What was the objection? Bright and harsh? In which case I will ask you again. Why is it odd that some people think a speaker, in this case the GMA, sounds bright and harsh whereas others dont? Could it not be equally odd that you fail to hear the brightness and harshness that others have reported? Could it be that you have hearing loss? Could it be that you are refusing to admit the truth? Could it be that you have bad hearing? There are clearly many possibilities that would need to be looked at.

Why don't you do readers a favor now, and stop polluting this thread with your biased, and frequently dishonest posts.

Why would my opinions be biased? for what purpose? If they sounded world class, why would i lie and say they sounded horrible? I'm afraid your argument makes no sense. You are the one that is biased because you believed everything Johnson said despite there being no evidence. You have been duped I'm afraid. You refuse to condemn the fact that Johnson had a proclivity to having posts that were inconvenient deleted. You have nothing to say about the reasons I mentioned that the GMA sounded bright and harsh. Face it. You are in denial. 

@kenjit

If I had a nickel for every time you were dishonest in your posts, I’d be able to purchase some very fancy cables.

Of the many archived posts relating to the subject speaker, the "bright and harsh" complaint is almost never found, and the vast majority of reactions are quite positive. It’s that simple. The specific criticism is very uncommon, hence the logical question of whether or not the problem may have been related to something other than the speakers themselves.

But wait … let me guess. Your next painful (for all readers) contortion will be to argue that all of those who liked the speakers may have been suffering from hearing loss, and were therefore unable to discern the brightness and harshness.

smh