If you don't have a wide sweet spot, are you really an audiophile?


Hi, it’s me, professional audio troll. I’ve been thinking about something as my new home listening room comes together:

The glory of having a wide sweet spot.

We focus far too much on the dentist chair type of listener experience. A sound which is truly superb only in one location. Then we try to optimize everything exactly in that virtual shoebox we keep our heads in. How many of us look for and optimize our listening experience to have a wide sweet spot instead?

I am reminded of listening to the Magico S1 Mk II speakers. While not flawless one thing they do exceptionally well is, in a good room, provide a very good, stable stereo image across almost any reasonable listening location. Revel’s also do this. There’s no sudden feeling of the image clicking when you are exactly equidistant from the two speakers. The image is good and very stable. Even directly in front of one speaker you can still get a sense of what is in the center and opposite sides. You don’t really notice a loss of focus when off axis like you can in so many setups.

Compare and contrast this with the opposite extreme, Sanders' ESL’s, which are OK off axis but when you are sitting in the right spot you suddenly feel like you are wearing headphones. The situation is very binary. You are either in the sweet spot or you are not.

From now on I’m declaring that I’m going all-in on wide-sweet spot listening. Being able to relax on one side of the couch or another, or meander around the house while enjoying great sounding music is a luxury we should all attempt to recreate.
erik_squires
Post removed 
I am amazed at your lack of reading comprehension and falsehoods you post based on ignorance and/or laziness as you have done above, but we all have our burdens to carry. May I suggest broadening the topics that you read and post in, as opposed to only a narrow set.
Insulting.... 😊😎

I wait for your argument about "bias"...

About "timbre"

About "imaging"

Point to me where i was wrong....

All this discussion begun with your affirmation that all turntable owners ignoring Nyquist theorem were ignorant de facto, remember? I just replied using simple acoustical concept to justify human ears against digital recording engineering... Acoustic is first after all for any common sense scientist...




One thing you said is true, your are the specialist in audio engineering not me....

I am only an ignorant audiophile who try to learn bits from his gear and room nothing else...You are absolutely right about that... But it does not means that i cannot answer to your posts with elementary acoustical or science concepts ...

And unlike you i stick to truth and this is truth...






But one thing you said about me is false: i know very well how to read and analyse concepts.... It was my day job....i teach reading....
Then reading your posts bad faith and conceptual limitations was child play....I even learned on the spot what you missed about acoustical concepts ....No technical sound replies from you, only insults and authority arguments...
Great philosopher once said "you make bold assertions in public.....then be prepared for the challenge".

That’s just how it goes....

So be prepared. Otherwise it may not be such a great idea to start with. Crying victim after the fact is never a good look.
Post removed 
Sound and music in particular is a very fragile thing. Does not take much to mess it up. Much harder to make better.....