All are different, owned multiple receivers, onkyo, Yamaha, pioneer, technics, Sansui, and several others since 1984.
plus amplifiers, - Onkyo, carver, proton, carvin, crown, crest,
Most were 45x45, 85x85, 100, 125, etc etc.
the amps with over 200@8 Ohm, were always better. Sounded better, effortless, and reproduced the power chords, drums solos, guitar solos, and everything else much better.
The notion of why do you need 248 more of the same watts when it’s the quality of the 2 watts. This is a selling point, advertisement of a companies product. This is my opinion, and thoughts after 35+ years owning a pick-up truck full of electronics. There is no substitute for having the headroom to power through every part of your music.
I rarely do any low level listening from my stereo system.
Many, many get rapture from a small flea watt amp into a nice pair of speakers. Personally, I’ve not had less than 250-300+ W amps since the very late 90’s til present.
Hav clipped %90 of every receiver & amp I’ve bought until I hit the 300+ wpc mark
My opinion and experience.
plus amplifiers, - Onkyo, carver, proton, carvin, crown, crest,
Most were 45x45, 85x85, 100, 125, etc etc.
the amps with over 200@8 Ohm, were always better. Sounded better, effortless, and reproduced the power chords, drums solos, guitar solos, and everything else much better.
The notion of why do you need 248 more of the same watts when it’s the quality of the 2 watts. This is a selling point, advertisement of a companies product. This is my opinion, and thoughts after 35+ years owning a pick-up truck full of electronics. There is no substitute for having the headroom to power through every part of your music.
I rarely do any low level listening from my stereo system.
Many, many get rapture from a small flea watt amp into a nice pair of speakers. Personally, I’ve not had less than 250-300+ W amps since the very late 90’s til present.
Hav clipped %90 of every receiver & amp I’ve bought until I hit the 300+ wpc mark
My opinion and experience.