Synergistic calls out Audioholics

Oh yeah children choking to death because their parents are dumber than rocks is freaking hilarious. I heard a comedian on the radio....

But if cognitive bias plays a role in why people think medically inner substances change their disease status, why could similar bias not play a role in evaluating audio?(It does).

Your habit to reduce ALL audible effects to be deceptive illusions or only BIASES if not measured or accountable by measures is linked to the false assumption and prejudice that consist to reduce any psychoacoustical experience and phenomenon to an electrical design property.... IT IS FALSE..... it contradict audio science in general and psychoacoustic science in particular....

MEASURES MUST BE CORRELATED TO HEARING.....

HEARING EXPERIENCE CANNOT BE REDUCED TO MEASURES ONLY...

If it was so, psychoacoustic science would be erased as a fundamental science and replaced by only physical acoustic....But the human subject is for the time being one of the main subject of science.... Human are not robots....

Are you able to think?


Your stategy to link audiophile experience of sound to homeopathy which you already discarded or to astrology, is a pure propaganda piece....

You would make me smile if it was not reflecting a tragedy....

Everything humans can hear can be measured. If not then psychoacoustics is a waste of time. If we can't measure it then we sure as hell can't study it. What do you think psychoacoustics is? Tarot card reading? 

But by acknowledging the stupid parents role in the death of their children is a step in the right direction.

Perhaps you can come up with some test for intelligence that is universally acknowledged as fair, accurate and without cultural bias. Of course we will know it is a viable test when it confirms that you are a genius. 

As nonoise points out just listen. If you are not willing to listen and compare you have nothing to add or to say. Arguing from a total lack of experience is completely unscientific. 

Everything humans can hear can be measured. If not then psychoacoustics is a waste of time. If we can’t measure it then we sure as hell can’t study it. What do you think psychoacoustics is? Tarot card reading?

Dr. Floyd Toole noted:

Technical measurements are demonstrably precise, repeatable events. Hearing perception is not. Obviously, the perceived event is definitive – if it does not sound good, it isn’t good. The task is to correlate what we measure with what we perceive – This is psychoacoustics.

This means that correlating measures when it is possible with hearing is essential BUT reducing hearing experience and concept to only a limited already known sets of measures, especially a limited sets imported from electrical design, that is FRAUDULENT and a negation of psychoacoustic science...

Psychoacoustic and audio experience are not reducible to a small part of electrical design ....

For example in creating the imaging experience and the listener envelopment experience electrical design measures are not the most important measures the important one are linked to the timing of the different wavefronts coming from the speakers.... All measures are not possible and dont all come from electrical design anyway....Sometimes the EARS are the most accurate measuring apparatus... Only ignorant  will negate this fact....

Is it not very simple to understand?

If not, quit posting about that.... Or go on and stick to the easy bashing of cables customers groups...And pay to be member of the skeptic sunday Jame Randi scientist club...They need members....