In the words of Obi-Wan: "There is another"
That stuff is all wire (silver, copper, carbon fiber, etc), where the molecular structure is locked and solid and is involved in the creation, or more a reflection... the effects we call complex impedance or LCR.
With liquid metal it is completely different. It behaves principally in a quantum fashion. A true and actual quantum level beast as the scientific descriptor of the fluid in situ. Not a buzz word. First time that it is real and is the dominant factor.
for the first time in most people’s lives ...to be able to distance themselves from wire, cables and LCR and see stereoscopically into the subject and find depth or perspective for the first time.
Eg, one can understand what copper sounds like and what silver sounds like and what carbon fiber cables sound like, but what if you remove the underling creator of the effect, the reaction of/in/between the lattice and electron flow, or LCR? What happens when the underlying anchoring fundamental changes? Only Liquid metal changes that and allows for perspective.
the next problem we encounter, is that the entire edifice of electronics and signal is done as a pairing and we can’t escape that influence. thus all audio systems are tuned and altered to fit the problems of when electricity integrates with frozen lattice elemental and alloy solids. When one introduces the liquid metal, they will hear a difference. but will it fit the tuning done, will it fit tuning (system building, expectations, how we learned to hear, etc) that has occurred due to the wire problems, the metals and electrical complex LCR problem?
Which one is correct?
Some people hear it and some don’t, some like it and ask for more and some don’t.
It literally is the biggest change in electrical conductor technology in the past 150 years. Take it to a professor of physics, one who specializes in electron flow, ask him If I exaggerate on that.
Has anyone ever read the patent? I took transformers and inductors and all that end of the AC energy translation pool and completely turned it on it’s goddamned head. How about load sensitive waveform, current, voltage, and frequency shifting and patterning, in a single passive translation device?
Has anyone ever actually read and understood the patent? Audio cables are the SMALLEST, most unimportant part of the patent. The wasted space part, relative to all the rest of it. I manged to nail the fundamental science, not the application of a known technology. Which is why the other thousand plus patents in new technology aren’t in it. They aren’t.. as it is a cornerstone patent, a fundamental patent. One has to read understand the ramifications of what it says - What it can all be extrapolated into.
That stuff is all wire (silver, copper, carbon fiber, etc), where the molecular structure is locked and solid and is involved in the creation, or more a reflection... the effects we call complex impedance or LCR.
With liquid metal it is completely different. It behaves principally in a quantum fashion. A true and actual quantum level beast as the scientific descriptor of the fluid in situ. Not a buzz word. First time that it is real and is the dominant factor.
for the first time in most people’s lives ...to be able to distance themselves from wire, cables and LCR and see stereoscopically into the subject and find depth or perspective for the first time.
Eg, one can understand what copper sounds like and what silver sounds like and what carbon fiber cables sound like, but what if you remove the underling creator of the effect, the reaction of/in/between the lattice and electron flow, or LCR? What happens when the underlying anchoring fundamental changes? Only Liquid metal changes that and allows for perspective.
the next problem we encounter, is that the entire edifice of electronics and signal is done as a pairing and we can’t escape that influence. thus all audio systems are tuned and altered to fit the problems of when electricity integrates with frozen lattice elemental and alloy solids. When one introduces the liquid metal, they will hear a difference. but will it fit the tuning done, will it fit tuning (system building, expectations, how we learned to hear, etc) that has occurred due to the wire problems, the metals and electrical complex LCR problem?
Which one is correct?
Some people hear it and some don’t, some like it and ask for more and some don’t.
It literally is the biggest change in electrical conductor technology in the past 150 years. Take it to a professor of physics, one who specializes in electron flow, ask him If I exaggerate on that.
Has anyone ever read the patent? I took transformers and inductors and all that end of the AC energy translation pool and completely turned it on it’s goddamned head. How about load sensitive waveform, current, voltage, and frequency shifting and patterning, in a single passive translation device?
Has anyone ever actually read and understood the patent? Audio cables are the SMALLEST, most unimportant part of the patent. The wasted space part, relative to all the rest of it. I manged to nail the fundamental science, not the application of a known technology. Which is why the other thousand plus patents in new technology aren’t in it. They aren’t.. as it is a cornerstone patent, a fundamental patent. One has to read understand the ramifications of what it says - What it can all be extrapolated into.