anton_stepichev OP42 posts04-20-2021 3:44am@djones
Why is it too far fetched?
You make a claim saying there is only one conclusion, I give an alternate conclusion you say is to far fetched. I fail to see how humans have bias is more far fetched than unknown signals hidden in wire unknown to science?? Let's not assume bias is to far fetched since we know it's a common human condition. You make an extraordinary claim concerning hidden signals, do you have any extraordinary evidence?
The problem is that we both can't prove our point using standard tests. They don't take too much into account, I wrote about it in my last answer to you.
You mean like a blind listening test? If you can't prove it with a blind listening test, then it is not there.
This hypothesis also has drawbacks. The wire is heard equally well both as an acoustic cable and as an IC, especially the difference is clearly noticeable in tube amps. A tube is controlled by grid voltage, there is no current in the circuit of tube grid, which means there is no field.
What's an acoustic cable? Do you mean speaker cable? I don't think you understand fields. Applied voltage generates a field independent of current. That will be an electrostatic field.
Also, this hypothesis does not explain the audibility of power cables that emit nothing but 60 hertz harmonics.
The level of the voltage changes at 60Hz. The frequency of the current may have a fundamental at 60Hz, but there will be harmonics up to many KHz and above.