mambacfa, in order to compare sources like that you have to switch back and forth concentrating on one detail at a time.
Over the years I have noticed that what people think sounds best has much less to do with accuracy than one would think. In some situations "accurate" actually sounds worse! This is very relevant when it comes to room treatment. As always beauty is in the eye of the beholder. A system that "sounds good" playing everything is most likely stamping it's own signature on everything it plays. There are plenty of terrible recordings out there both digital and analog. The vagaries of speaker performance far outweigh any differences between digital and analog playback.
The preference of one format over the other is most likely due to other factors besides sound quality. Number one would probably be convenience. Insisting that one format always sounds better than the other. Very few issues are "always."
Over the years I have noticed that what people think sounds best has much less to do with accuracy than one would think. In some situations "accurate" actually sounds worse! This is very relevant when it comes to room treatment. As always beauty is in the eye of the beholder. A system that "sounds good" playing everything is most likely stamping it's own signature on everything it plays. There are plenty of terrible recordings out there both digital and analog. The vagaries of speaker performance far outweigh any differences between digital and analog playback.
The preference of one format over the other is most likely due to other factors besides sound quality. Number one would probably be convenience. Insisting that one format always sounds better than the other. Very few issues are "always."