Let me rephrase it for you so you understand my point ...
1+1 = 2
1.001 + 1 = 2.001
Let me rephrase it for you so you will understand my point ...
f(x) = kx(1-x)
It is an iterative process...
Nevermind where you are in the n’th stage of the process there always will be a new stage which will enter in the cycles....
Between perceived phenomena and consciousness there is place for unknown or new phenomena to appear...
Then eliminating bias is a good procedure in testing.... we must do it....
Cultivating bias is a good procedure in training perception....We must do it....
Correlating the two IS science.... Not one without the other .... It is an iterative process not a static addition or substraction....
"That is what analyzing an electrical signal does. It allows us to determine a change, from a reference, in vastly greater detail than any human can. It is not even close."
No measuring will replace human perception , a tool, so accurate it is, work from some chosen parameter in ONE chosen dimension and cannot replace human experience....
Not only can we build on past work and testing if it is the correct chosen direction for sure, but we can also change direction and create new tool: like a directional wire to satisfy our confirmed perception ....
Tools dont compete with human perception they only serve it....The way we decide....
Technology ask for standard practices...
Science ask for innovative thinking...
The two are not opposite at all....
Nobody is against virtue(measuring) but sometimes evil(creativity) serves a greater good....