@teo_audio
I think this is right, and if I understand it it means --
We don't want "virtue signaling" -- we want virtue; that is, self-control in how we signal, avoiding ad hominem attacks.
We want "retort" in the sense of logical rebuttal, done with respect and civility.
Finding the median? The arguer really has two jobs, logical and emotional. The logical job is to present the argument in ways that highlight the facts and stakes as they see them and to push back against claims which seem false or exaggerated in ways that simply present counter facts or demur. The emotional job is the one featured in that scene with Luke and Yoda -- to look into oneself and reflect on whatever makes one want to strike out in anger; and then tame that part of oneself. It's the bigger challenge for all of us, so perhaps having a bit of tolerance for other's foibles (aka "humor") is the key ingredient, after all.
Retort is require to correct problems, and if it’s all virtue signalling and consequence.... then we get killed for raising the correct questions.
So, good luck finding the median.
I think this is right, and if I understand it it means --
We don't want "virtue signaling" -- we want virtue; that is, self-control in how we signal, avoiding ad hominem attacks.
We want "retort" in the sense of logical rebuttal, done with respect and civility.
Finding the median? The arguer really has two jobs, logical and emotional. The logical job is to present the argument in ways that highlight the facts and stakes as they see them and to push back against claims which seem false or exaggerated in ways that simply present counter facts or demur. The emotional job is the one featured in that scene with Luke and Yoda -- to look into oneself and reflect on whatever makes one want to strike out in anger; and then tame that part of oneself. It's the bigger challenge for all of us, so perhaps having a bit of tolerance for other's foibles (aka "humor") is the key ingredient, after all.