You are comical!
For sure hypothesis is used in the first line of this research paper....Guess why?
It is not the word "hypothesis" the problem, it was your way to say in a discredited manner that it is "ONLY AN HYPOTHESIS"...
In all reasearch papers EVERYBODY know or you must know that any research start with a "hypothesis" justifying the experiment...The word hypothesis dont discredited the value of an experiment....Save in your head...
Then for you to say it is "only an hypothesis" is like saying nothing of that is PROVED.... It is a way to denigrate the paper which inspired me....For sure nothing is proved definitively here but it inspire me and it is a very interesting "hypothesis".... At least say it.....Spite it.....
Then for you to say that is is "only an hypothesis", it is not an argument, but a sophism......
English is not my first language but i know how to read and think.....And i know you a bit now...
For sure hypothesis is used in the first line of this research paper....Guess why?
It is not the word "hypothesis" the problem, it was your way to say in a discredited manner that it is "ONLY AN HYPOTHESIS"...
In all reasearch papers EVERYBODY know or you must know that any research start with a "hypothesis" justifying the experiment...The word hypothesis dont discredited the value of an experiment....Save in your head...
Then for you to say it is "only an hypothesis" is like saying nothing of that is PROVED.... It is a way to denigrate the paper which inspired me....For sure nothing is proved definitively here but it inspire me and it is a very interesting "hypothesis".... At least say it.....Spite it.....
Then for you to say that is is "only an hypothesis", it is not an argument, but a sophism......
English is not my first language but i know how to read and think.....And i know you a bit now...