Revel Salon 2 vs Vandersteen 5a Carbon


I am a senior looking for my final set of speakers. Will be powered by McIntosh 452 amp and McIntosh C2500 preamp in a 20 x 18 room . Have Goldenear Triton 1’s and Ohm 5 mk-2  speakers now. Will I appreciate significant sound upgrade? Which would you recommend and why?
tooth2th
yes of course i have heard and setup the 5a Carbon, etc from the Vandy line. Soundstaging, coherence and great bass in any room are hallmarks of the design. Fatigue free listening for countless hours.

Read the 7 reviews, it’s 90% of them at a fraction of the $. 
I'm biased, as I have Vandersteen Treo Ct's. The 5A Carbons would be an excellent choice for you. Although the Revel Salon 2's are a fine speaker too.
I have 5A’s (not carbons).....they really benefit from the best components you can fit with them. Very spacious and 3 dimensional. I have upgraded to the Kowazinga wood when I bought them....meticulous woodworking....gorgeous.
I owned the 3A Signatures and recently sold them to fund the purchase of a used pair of Revel Ultima Studios. I've also listened to the Treo and Quatro CTs though.

Soundwise, I think you'll be happy with either.

The Vandys will need a lot more attention with respect to placement. The time aligned design means that the sweet spot will be fairly narrow. If I moved my head a few inches away from the sweet spot, the tonality changed markedly. What this means is it can drive you a little crazy dialing in the sound since small changes to either the speaker's position or your position can affect the sound.

The Revels were much easier to place in my listening space by comparison. The sweet spot is larger and if you move far away from it, the tonality doesn't change as much.

All the standard advice about speaker placement pretty much applies to the Revels. I recommend closely following the placement guide written in the 5A Carbon manual to get the most out of them.

Hope this helps!