Speaker size and soundstage


Question: for floor standing speakers, how does speaker size affect sound stage, bass response, and the depth of music?

I’m searching for a new speaker, and just tested Dynaudio Contour 30 against Tekton Electrons (16x18 room with cathedral ceiling). Tekton’s are bigger (48 vs 45 high, and 10 vs 8.5 wide, about the same depth) and had a much larger sound stage and greater dynamics and depth. Tekton’s as a rule are much bigger than most other brands, which can be imposing in a room, but the size must equate to a greater sound stage. 
But can a smaller tower be designed to achieve the same sound stage and bass depth of a bigger speaker? If so, what what speakers pull this off?
w123ale
I think people have different definitions of soundstage. IMO, it means a speaker's ability to portray the musicians in the places they were put in the recording so instruments can be identified by location.
That sounds more like what I'd call "imaging", namely, the precision and accuracy of the musicians' apparent placement relative to each other ... and within the soundstage.  I think of "soundstage" as the 3D space bounding this placement.  Presumably, most audiophiles want a soundstage with the greatest apparent breadth, depth, and height achievable for playback of any given recording. But presumably they also want sharply defined images, along with the illusion that the speakers disappear within the soundstage. 

The Bose direct-reflecting design can achieve a big apparent soundstage even from very small satellite speakers along with a single subwoofer. That may sound impressive and pleasant at first listen, but I wouldn't expect very precise, accurate imaging (or frequency response) from that approach.  Admittedly I have not listened to Bose speakers for many years or in a wide variety of settings.  

On the other hand, I had a pair of Totem Arros, which are small floor standers with a reputation for excellent imaging.  I found they did indeed consistently produce a sharp center image and the speakers did indeed seem to disappear within the soundstage. However, the soundstage was not especially wide, deep, or high (at least not in my set-up).  Furthermore, the skinny boxes could only accommodate 4.5" woofers, which limited the bass impact.

Lots of factors and trade-offs. 
The monitor audio gold generation 5 and platinum generation 2 both have incredibly huge three-dimensional sound stages.
Think about it are manufacturers' top models smaller than their entry levels? If small was the best way wouldn't loudspeakers get smaller as their cost and performance increased? Wouldn't the end goal of loudspeaker design be to get as small as possible? 
I don't know if there is an agreed "package" that delivers the goods you speak of.

Too many variables.

I say this because of a past experience. I heard the Soundsmith Strain Gauge cartridge thru Peters  small, average looking bookshelves which  made  HUGE music coming out of them. They didn't sound like wimpy little bookshelves. 

Never experienced that ever again.

This was achieved with one of my "stampers" played on a VPI HRX. Really a "pedestrian" setup by audiophool standards.

Recording will play a major part of getting that immersive experience.
I noticed a significant change when moving my towers away from the wall.  However, the biggest charge came after adding a pair of Rel S2 Sho subs.  The key is to dial the subs in with the correct crossover and to dial in the volume.  I think the mid’s on my towers sounded better.