Anybody gone from ethernet to optical for connection to a streamer?

Fibre is the best upgrade I have done on my streaming. The OpticalRendu is great. Ethernet direct into a DAC was about the same as my microRendu. Fibre optical was so much better than either of those 2. It was so obvious to me that I immediately bought a second OpticalRendu. I have been using both for about 6 months now on 2 DACs.

The only DAC with Ethernet that I think could be very good and challenge the Fibre optical is the upcoming AudioByte Hub (need the VOX + ZAP).

@jd55 I use this switch for fibre. 
Ubiquiti - UniFi® Switch 8-150W

No matter what you read here, listen for yourself and then decide.  This stuff is dependent on your equipment and on your environment, including the length of run from your router to your streamer, and the amount of EMI/RFI present in your home.  The equipment I use (both the server/streamer and DAC) have internal galvanic isolation and I have yet to hear meaningful differences when trying a variety of small boxes that many others say have a profound effect. 

That said, I am currently running 45 feet of fiber from my router to just before my server/streamer, where it is converted to a very short Ethernet cable, which enters the streamer.  Both the converters, at the router and at the server/streamer, are powered with linear power supplies and not the standard SMPS used in wall warts. 

I have run CAT 5, CAT 7, and CAT 8 cables and again have not noticed significant differences.  If anything, the fiber may result in a bit smoother sound compared to any of the CAT cables, or it may be my imagination.   You may want to look at the differences between CAT cables which vary in the level of shielding.  CAT 8 provides the highest level of shielding and could offer an improvement in noisy environments.    Both the fiber cable and the converters are inexpensive so try for yourself and let your ears decide what sounds best for your gear and environment.

I agree ethernet cables make difference. Thread got me to wondering where optimum optical placement would be. I'm using just prior to USB renderer based on idea last segment of ethernet chain would provide greatest benefit. On the other hand, if converter placed just after modem, in other words first link in chain, may provide greatest benefit. The idea is any junk riding coax into modem, modem itself and first ethernet cable out of modem would be galvanically isolated, benefiting server. Problem then is EMI/RFI in house can enter after first link.  And then I could go further, keep present optical conversion, add the second optical setup prior to server. And then, we could only be so lucky to have fiber optical service from cable company. Even at this, ethernet cable within your house would be susceptible to EMI/RFI.
Ultimate setup, fiber feed all the way from cable company through entire ethernet and digital audio equipment throughout house having available fiber connections direct to optimized optical connection on dac.


Yes, I continue to say optimizing streaming solutions is the most complex undertaking I've yet encountered in audio. My experience is every single minute link in chain makes a qualitative difference. Relatively high degrees of improvement are available at every link in chain, and fast evolving innovations mean highest quality streaming never a stable situation.

Yes, optical is a big improvement. Can't say enough good stuff about the Sonore opticalRendu fed from a NAS device in another room. A good power supply for your renderer is also very important to allowing you to hear everything your optical changes will bring. 
Tons of threads on these topics here and on audiophilelifestyle. It's worth doing plenty of research to get a handle on it. Cheers,
Spencer

My player has an optical network input, so does getting sonore rendu thingy make sense?