I really like the Charney speakers, and I also like the Nenuphar speaker too. I don't think I can attribute what I like to the lack of a crossover, but, that certainly is a possible reason why they both sound so good. I think I could live with the Charney, particularly with one of the better AER drivers in it.
But, I own a three way system that, on balance, I like even more than either of the speakers mentioned above. Yes, it costs far more than either speaker (the midrange horn/compression drivers alone cost more than either systems), and it is certainly not better in all respects and I can easily understand why someone would prefer either of the two models under discussion. My system is 99 db/w efficient, so it has not suffered too much from loss of efficiency from having a crossover. A friend has a three way horn system that is 107 db/w efficient. A crossover does soak up some power, particularly if it is complex and it is used to correct phase/timing and to correct frequency response anomalies, but, utilizing drivers optimized for performing over a limited frequency range has its pluses.
But, I own a three way system that, on balance, I like even more than either of the speakers mentioned above. Yes, it costs far more than either speaker (the midrange horn/compression drivers alone cost more than either systems), and it is certainly not better in all respects and I can easily understand why someone would prefer either of the two models under discussion. My system is 99 db/w efficient, so it has not suffered too much from loss of efficiency from having a crossover. A friend has a three way horn system that is 107 db/w efficient. A crossover does soak up some power, particularly if it is complex and it is used to correct phase/timing and to correct frequency response anomalies, but, utilizing drivers optimized for performing over a limited frequency range has its pluses.