The Phoenix setup is real time speed adjustment.
The VPI isn't. That alone, makes it more accurate.
The VPI isn't. That alone, makes it more accurate.
Sota Total Eclipse package for VPI tables first impression
@melm, FWIW I have never found that quick switching from one alternative to another to be a useful guide to judging SQ. Even more so when the switch will take time as switching between the two motors will. A week of relaxed listening is the only thing that does it for me to decide which is better. Because I have the flywheel, we will be able to set both motors side by side, and be able to switch the belts from one motor to the other faster than changing interconnects. I've always found side by side comparisons to be most helpful. We'll be listening to favorite tracks, one at a time, and the listener won't be able to see which motor is active. The problem with 2 weeks at a time is that I'll know what I'm listening to, and I'd be relying on long term audio memory. I'm confident enough in my listening skills that if there's a difference I'll hear it side by side. |
@tablejockey The Phoenix setup is real time speed adjustment.It's not really real time. Once per revolution the speed is calculated and adjusted. It's more adaptive than real time, the VPI solution is set it and forget it, which doesn't take into account variations due to bearing temperature or stylus drag. I agree the Eclipse package is in theory a much better system of speed regulation. The better motor is the icing on the cake. |
@vinylzone You never posted the results of your comparison and listening event!!! I'm curious about speed control and own a VPI turntable. Your impressions would be greatly appreciated. |