Distributed Bass Array configuration


Please, I don't want to debate the merits of the DBA nor of those who espouse it. I am considering adding two more subwoofers to a system that has two already. To those who use a DBA,I am interested in how you have configured them, specifically--
  1. Do you run in mono, or do you split the array to run in stereo?
  2. What is your approach to setting phase (delay) among speakers that may be facing different directions and are different distances from the listener?
Thanks!
mike_in_nc
So many confusing terms and uses.

Stereo recordings may not have special attention to the bass, so yes, it could be recorded in stereo.  Especially with purist, 2 or 3 microphone recordings, re-mixing the bass so that both L and R speakers had equal bass output is not something every mastering engineer thinks about. HT is very different.

The reproduction of the lowest octaves is omnidirectional due to the ratio of the wavelength to the driver.  You could make a directional bass driver, but it would be 10' or more in diameter.

The human ear / brain mechanism cannot place 80Hz and lower frequencies in a stereo sound field if the following conditions are met:

1. Lack of room rattles or other noises which can clue the brain in.
2. Equivalent room mode excitation/reinforcement.
3. Steep enough low pass filter to prevent higher frequencies from playing through.
4. The listener is placed reasonably central to the stereo speakers.

As a result a single subwoofer, properly integrated into a system (which is very rare) is not audible as a subwoofer nor can it's output be placed while listening from a fixed location.

The only clue in my listening room if my 1 subwoofer, placed stage left, is on or off is the bass extension. If you don't have that experience it's not because you have magic ears.  It's your room or the subwoofer integration.

Lastly, your main speakers will sound much better if  you high pass them at 80 than at 40 Hz.

Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

Erik
Lastly, your main speakers will sound much better if you high pass them at 80 than at 40 Hz.
Depends on the room, main, sub and processing available. My mains are -3dB @ 31Hz measured pseudo-anechoic. ≈40Hz integrates better than 80Hz.

When I used Spica TC-50, ≈90Hz.

The clarity obtained by LF attenuation in the mains with good subs should not be ignored:
  1. Increased apparent amplifier power
  2. Reduced voice coil heating which preserves XO frequency to the mid driver.
  3. Reduced IM & THD in the woofer
  4. Reduced current demand and its consequent mid & tweet modulation.
Tim ( noble101), yes, it does get better as you add subs. I couldn’t believe how much improvement there was adding a third sub after already getting the improvement of adding a second. My front subs have to go to the inside of the mains because there is an opening to the entryway on the right and an opening to a hallway and a sitting room beyond that on the left. Open floor plan and basically no corners either in the front. So that may be one reason for a dramatic improvement of the third. Don’t know if I’ll add a fourth.
What measurements establish the “improved bass”?  Improved in what way?

Just  wondering.  Is it just more? More  extended?  Flatter response ?  Different frequency curve?    What exactly is different than prior?