larryi2,540 posts07-06-2021 1:43pmI can't follow the argument at all. If making a cap change makes the differences in the amps very evident, how can you then say the amps all sound essentially the same?
I found the Mundorf SESGO .47's on the 12 tube circuit to be substantial gains in the slam bass department. Worth the $650?? Yeah I;'d say so, 1 time deal. ,
maybe even some gaisn in upper mids.highs, Not sure as THE SEAS MILLENNIUM IS A MISERABLE 87DB SENS = dysfunctional, not able to register the gains made by the addition of the .47 SESGO Mundorf caps.
The W18's responded nicely.
This is what i am trying to get it,
I am confident if we take the Jadis Defy7, and swap the caps with the highs ens speaker, We will all note both bass gains as in the W18's response, but as well note gains in other fq register
'Why? Sens is much higher , like 91++db, On the Vox spec page.
TRUE 91db, Seas Millennium has dips valleys, and is nota solid 87, there is SIGNIFICANT roll off over 10k hz. And thats with Mudorf high end caps in the xover.
= complete waste of money. The Mundorf's only gave a MINISCLE tweak upgrade to the Millennium resolution.
Point being higher sens, wide band, will trump any dome, in fact any tweeter Ribbons, AMT's you name it, every single time.
Wide band are simply magical, and most folks just find them mysterious and **what i can't understand, is not worth looking into*
And back they go to xover brands. .
No xover fan-atic can give any supportive reasons why we should all stay with their popular vote.
All factors for voicing high fidelity point in the direction of wide band.
Its here, and ain't going no where.
What is moving down hill are xover speaker sales. Ck out the used grave yard. WOW, 45 days, no bites.
Its sad. Really depressing to know other audiophles are suffering with their listing.
I feel for ya.