I love music and videos. I am fortunate enough to have a separate audio and home theater… which is ideal as they have somewhat different requirements and can get in each other’s way. But they can be combined effectively. Some good speakers and a good amp can raise the 2-ch part to a very high level of performance… ultimately limited by the receiver. But people’s lives change… more money, maybe move. Then those expensive speakers and amp can look like a tremendously good decision. Since my interest in music and home theater has persisted over my life, every time I reached for better gear than I necessarily could justify with my other components it has been a great decision in retrospect.
Diminishing returns?
I have a Denon X3700, which I bought primarily for it being within my budget, and capable of handling 8k and HDMI 2.1. I’m currently in the market for floor standing speakers that will serve a dual purpose as both 2ch audio, and the L/R in a 5.1.
I would imagine at some point, the limitations of the receiver will outweigh the benefits of purchasing higher-end speakers? In essence I would lack the equipment necessary to truly bring out the best in the speakers. Is this an incorrect assumption? Assuming I don’t plan on using anything besides the aforementioned Denon, at what price point would investing in more expensive speakers be pointless?
I would imagine at some point, the limitations of the receiver will outweigh the benefits of purchasing higher-end speakers? In essence I would lack the equipment necessary to truly bring out the best in the speakers. Is this an incorrect assumption? Assuming I don’t plan on using anything besides the aforementioned Denon, at what price point would investing in more expensive speakers be pointless?
- ...
- 14 posts total
- 14 posts total