Paper Cones in HiFi?


I may be naive or uninformed but I've noticed several speaker mfrs using paper cones in speakers priced over $2k (ie Vienna Acoustics Bach and Sonus Faber Grand Piano). I always thought paper cones were for low end Radio Shack speakers.

Can some please educate me.

Thanks.
alivadariu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2pvz6RDBCE

Paper vs Balsa C/F with the ruthless truth machine German laser…

Listen and measure…or wander randomly


With loudspeakers, it's the total design and how the parts are utilized to achieve the designer's end goals whatever those maybe focusing on one aspect of a transducer's design is moot. 


Scanspeak makes some fairly expensive paper coned woofers.  I don't think they think that paper is crap.  A local dealer that builds its own custom speakers just finished a pair that utilizes 15" paper coned drivers from Scanspeak.  The drivers cost the dealer $2,000 each.  The speaker just came in and the crossover has not been mounted so I haven't heard them playing, but, I will get a chance.  
Every material for drivers; paper, aluminum, kevlar, carbon fiber, nomex, ceramic, magnesium, beryllium, etc.... all have pros and cons.  And incidentally, more people than SEAS and Scanspeak make great drivers.  

Each material has different characteristics that behave differently in different applications.  Paper is not inherently good or bad.  Paper cones are not simple card sock cut into a cone.  The formula is typically a carefully guarded secret and they can deliver elite level performance.  I find the paper drivers I use (Eton's Orchestra) offer a tiny bit of coloration which makes them engaging and incredibly musical. In the right application, paper drivers can simply be extraordinary.  

In terms of accuracy, I agree that magnesium offers some distinct benefits.  I prefer Eton's magnesium driver to SEAS more because it is much easier to work with.  The SEAS is very difficult to get the crossover just right while Eton's Arcosia works with simpler crossovers and delivers and incredibly smooth yet accurate sound.  I actually prefer Eton's paper drivers compared to Scanspeak as well.  But, this is based on my designs and my experience using lightweight but heavily damped cabinet material.  The EXACT opposite of say Joseph Audio or Wilson who are producing high mass cabinets.  

In the end, a speaker is a complete system and you can't take a driver and say it is "the best" without the context of cabinet and crossover.  A great driver in a bad cabinet or with a bad crossover will deliver a bad speaker.  A modestly priced driver integrated with the right cabinet and the right crossover can be insanely good and in the end, it is the complete design that matters.  Individual parts should be taken in the context of that system. 


@larryi --

Scanspeak makes some fairly expensive paper coned woofers. I don't think they think that paper is crap. A local dealer that builds its own custom speakers just finished a pair that utilizes 15" paper coned drivers from Scanspeak. The drivers cost the dealer $2,000 each. The speaker just came in and the crossover has not been mounted so I haven't heard them playing, but, I will get a chance.  

I wonder what the reason is for their 15" driver to be that expensive, and how the sonic results would ever reflect the price positively. I guess that's up to the individual to decide..

Arguments have been made that high efficiency drivers are more expensive due to the smaller tolerances required in the voice coil gap, but there are many great HE pro drivers that, when looking at their typically vastly bigger magnets, voice coils and overall size, compare favorably here to hifi drivers of smaller size and not least (much) lower efficiency. Go figure.

It's telling then that when Scanspeak sets out to make a 15" driver, likely only no more than moderately sensitive at that, the dealer cost is $2,000 (even more for the consumer, I presume). Not to dismiss their efforts prematurely, but that's hifi in a nutshell.