2. speakers
  3. 168689-103836

Vandersteen 1C to 3A Signature

I currently own the 1Cs, paired with a Naim Nait 5i. I like the sound, have had these speakers for the better part of 15 years and I still love their presentation, the openness and sense of space they provide. They are fabulous to my ears.

Which isn’t to say they are perfect, they don’t like being played too loud (seem fragile, break up at higher volumes), and the bass isn’t as deep or (more importantly) as defined as it could be. Also I sometimes hear some lack of refinement in the tweeter (although at other times it sounds positively glorious, especially with horns and flutes).  So after refinishing the basement and adding a big TV with prewired surround sound I found a used Vandersteen center speaker, so I’m thinking of moving the 1C to the basement and getting a different (hopefully better) speaker for upstairs. I did a bit of research and it appears Spendor is supposed to be a good match for Naim, so I was able to borrow a pair of S8E to try out. You can tell the speaker can handle much more power and can play cleanly at those high levels, and the sound is nicely balanced throughout the frequency range, but they sound like boxes. The Vandy’s don’t. I think I’ve written off Spendor, Proac, Totem and the like, as the design looks similar.

I should probably stick with Vandersteen or similar sounding speakers. I have an opportunity to buy some 3A Signatures, but am afraid I will lose the lithe nature of the 1’s which I like, so I’m looking for opinions on this, and maybe for suggestions of other models that would sort of fit into the sound I’ve tried to describe. Thanks
128x128phaco
tomic601's avatar
tomic601
12,911 posts
 
Treo will suit you much better. Find an owner who is upgrading to the carbon tweeter. One of my systems is built around the Treo, the other 7’s. There is a lot of development and engineering from the 7 in the Treo.
loved my 3a-Sig, Brother still has them but they iMO need an amp w grunt and drive, the box w sound anchors is not small.
see treo system
https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/7100

consider joining the Vandy owners forum 

enjoy the music !

jim

tomic601's avatar
tomic601
12,911 posts
 
IF going new and visiting a Vandy dealer the advice you got about considering the latest version of the 2 is excellent! Lots of refinement poured into that best seller over the years - made in USA since 1977
bkeske's avatar
bkeske
5,597 posts
 
Excellent advice thus far. I moved from my 1C’s to 2CE Sigs in a matter of a month (got very lucky with someone selling his 2’s for a very very fair price), seriously, as I fell in love with the 1’s sound and wanted more. You would not loose anything moving up, IMO, only gain more of what you already like about the 1’s.

The 3’s should work nicely for you if the price is right, but as Jim @tomic601 stated, the new 2 model III’s sound to be an incredible solution as well, as would be the Treo’s, but I would assume a larger investment.

I don’t think you can go wrong with any of them. BTW, I still have the 1’s as ‘rear’ speakers in my HT set-up, and comforted in that they are solid back-up speakers as well. I had to do that while getting one of my acoustic couplers repaired. Was nice to have them at the time, but could not wait to get the 2CE Sigs back in operation. Big difference.
johnto
1,023 posts
 
I would call John Rutan at the Audio Connection in NJ he's a dealer but also a great guy I'm sure he can answer all your questions.
patrickdowns's avatar
patrickdowns
512 posts
 
I auditioned the Treo CT and the newest 2CE Signature III against each other for a long time, and chose the new 2CE to replace a 20 year old pair. At the time I was considering a like-new pair of Treo CTs (1 year old, $6000), and I still second-guess myself for not getting them. They don’t come up for sale often.

I think the newest 2CE is arguably a better speaker than the 3, and my dealer said the same thing. It’s certainly a better value. I would get the Treo CT instead of a pair of 3’s for sure.

Virtues of the 2CE Sig III:
* Price ... a superb value.
* Better bass extension than the Treo (though the bass the Treo has IS superb)
*Same mid-range drive as the Treo CT, iirc

Virtues of the Treo CT:
* Gorgeous speakers, and much better spouse acceptance factor esp. for a living room
* More solid cabinet, fewer resonances
* Carbon tweeter. My 63 year old ears couldn’t hear much difference between it and the 2CE, and the midrange of the two seemed equal. Said to be a better tweeter by "everyone" though.
* Can be placed closer to the wall without messing up the bass response

The salesman at my dealer owns a pair of 2CEs that he has paired with $20k of amp and preamp, and he says they just sung beautifully. With every improvement to the front end, the speakers rose to the occasion. When I was trying to choose, he warned me that the Treos might reveal deficiencies in my front end more than the 2CE’s did, which meant upgrading everything and I couldn’t do that. The other salesman there has Treo CTs to which he’s added a pair of subwoofers (the alternative could have been the Quatro CT), with an Audio Research front end and Chord Hugo TT2 DAC, and he says it’s magical. More $$ than I have!

I am in the process of investing about $10k in amp/preamp or integrated soon, and I think the 2CE’s will rise to the occasion. Of course, that’s pocket change for some of you! Maybe later I will switch to the Treo CT. Maybe.

Long-winded tale, taking it FWIW. Good luck.

More to discover