2. music
  3. 168637-18279

Sonics? All Things Must Pass -50th Anniversary

I haven’t spent much time with this release yet. I listened to it in the car on a 300 mile drive today for work. Then, and I mean right now, I’m streaming it (over pretty good gear) and I must say, I was expecting the clarity heard on the Harrison’s "Early Takes". Yet the production is on the darker side of things--in my ear.

Early Takes, sounds to my ear, like an open window into what Harrison sounded like in the studio at that time. It’s spectacular in its efficiency and cleanliness. My first impressions of the 50th ATMP is that it is clearer than the original and the Spector treatment is no longer a dominant feature. The sonics of things do not improve though. And I think they should and, more importantly, they could.

Has anyone heard Early Takes? Have you heard the new 50th Anniversary All Things Must Pass? Thoughts?

128x128jbhiller
bdp24's avatar
bdp24
9,816 posts
 
Thanks Stuart, I've been meaning to see what Fremer has to say about it. Though Bobby Whitlock is probably not an audiophile, and in all likelihood has a mid-fi at best system, his description of the 50th is right in line with your Fremer quote.

Too bad Dhani and Hicks didn't bring Whitlock and Clapton in to collaborate on the remix. A lost opportunity for sure. 
slaw's avatar
slaw
21,602 posts
 
See my first comparison on What's on your turntable tonight thread.
jafant's avatar
jafant
19,719 posts
 
I own the 5-CD set. It will take a few weeks to delve into this latest iteration of a Classic album.

Happy Listening!
stuartk
2,857 posts
 
It's now possible to compare the 2014 remaster and the 50th anniversary on spotify. Even on my computer speakers, the differences are fairly obvious. The The 50th A. features more up-front vocals and at first, an refreshing overall  impression of clarity. I say "impression", because I became increasingly aware that drums and bass have also been accentuated which, to my ears, makes for muddy lower mids despite a relative improvement in clarity up top. This muddiness is something certain youtube reviewrers have complained about. Harrison was not that strong of a vocalist and I actually prefer the 2014 version, where his voice sits more in the mix, rather than standing out. Ironically, I found the 2014 more emotionally engaging. Of course, others will hear differerently. 
stuartk
2,857 posts
 
I didn't mention that, compared to Fremer I didn't hear "an incredibly dull" top-end. For one thing Harrison's slide parts sounded more  vivid and three dimensional to me. But unlike Fremer, I'm listening on cheap computer speakers when making these comparisons. 
More to discover